IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v11y2017i1p120-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Europe 2020 Strategy And Beneficiaries Of Structural Funds

Author

Listed:
  • Larisa-Diana POP
  • Anca BORZA

Abstract

This article investigates goal I Investing for growth and job creation “ of Europe 2020 Strategy and how it influences the small and medium enterprises sector. We look to show how both structural and government fund implements this indicator. From the point of view of the private beneficiaries, the investment decision is a financial one (profit is being pursued) and, in view of the structural funds allocated, it is desirable to achieve the objectives of the European Union policy. Human resource in this case may be called beneficiary demonstrated by project indicators. But unlike the beneficiaries defined by the guide, they do not have to meet eligibility criteria or to reach indicators of the program. Based on 2 structural funds and 3 government funds we find some patterns, which could explain why the human resource/employs may be called beneficiaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Larisa-Diana POP & Anca BORZA, 2017. "The Europe 2020 Strategy And Beneficiaries Of Structural Funds," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 120-128, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:120-128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2017/pdf/1_13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Bachtler & Martin Ferry, 2015. "Conditionalities and the Performance of European Structural Funds: A Principal-Agent Analysis of Control Mechanisms in European Union Cohesion Policy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1258-1273, August.
    2. Eva Palinko & Agnes Svoob & Marta Szabo, 2013. "Enhancing the Financial Absorption Capacity of EU Member States Through the Reconsideration of Current Allocation Rules," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 20(3), pages 351-366, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ces:ifofor:v:19:y:2018:i:1:p:10-15 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Carlos Mendez & John Bachtler, 2017. "Financial Compliance in the European Union: A Cross-National Assessment of Financial Correction Patterns and Causes in Cohesion Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 569-592, May.
    3. Sébastien Bourdin, 2022. "The Challenges of Cohesion Policy in a postpandemic Europe: Towards greater territorial cohesion? [Les défis de la Politique de Cohésion dans une Europe post-pandémique : vers une plus grande cohés," Post-Print hal-04190368, HAL.
    4. Ramona Pîrvu & Roxana Bădîrcea & Alina Manta & Mihaela Lupăncescu, 2018. "The Effects of the Cohesion Policy on the Sustainable Development of the Development Regions in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Giovanni Cunico & Eirini Aivazidou & Edoardo Mollona, 2024. "Investigating Supply and Demand in European Cohesion Policy: Micro-Foundations of Macro-Behaviours," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8148-8178, June.
    6. Beata Skubiak, 2021. "Revitalization Education in Problem Areas as a Tool for the Implementation of Social Welfare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Larisa-Diana POP & Anca BORZA, 2015. "Structural And Cohesion Funds - Way To Increase Competitiveness At Enterprise Level," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 893-901, November.
    8. Cunico, Giovanni & Aivazidou, Eirini & Mollona, Edoardo, 2021. "Beyond financial proxies in Cohesion Policy inputs’ monitoring: A system dynamics approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:120-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.