IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/efinvm/v10y2011i1p19-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving Organizational Performance Through Computerized Management Tools In The Context Of Transition To Knowledge-Based Economy By Taking Into Account The Social Responsibility Role

Author

Listed:
  • Robert SEREMETA

    (The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Alexandra Elena CÃLDÃRARU

    (The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Luminiþa Mihaela DUMITRAªCU

    (The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

This paper aims to highlight the importance of computerization management tools in the context of transition to knowledge-based economy. The systems, methods and classical management techniques will be incorporated into informational systems, which will allow streamlining budgets for managers and will increase processing speed, and transferring information and knowledge within the organization. In the first part of the paper we approach the knowledge revolution, the knowledge-based economy characteristics and Knowledge Management features. In the second part of the paper we will highlight the important role of computerization management tools by presenting some systems and methods that keeping their technical characteristics by incorporating them in informational systems generate economic and organizational performance. These following systems and methods will be presented: expert systems, electronic dashboard and BPM systems. The role of computerization management tools is the basis to improve decision-making process and the decision in general. The computerization of management methods and systems will reduce time and managers efforts in performing routine tasks, information and knowledge processing speed will be increased and the management systems analysis speed will be amplified. All these issues will help managers but also performers to make decisions faster and more efficient, reliable premise of achieving competitiveness and organizational performance. We will take into account in the last part of the paper the social responsibility role, which is far too often left aside by managers to focus on increasing the organizational efficiency and effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert SEREMETA & Alexandra Elena CÃLDÃRARU & Luminiþa Mihaela DUMITRAªCU, 2011. "Achieving Organizational Performance Through Computerized Management Tools In The Context Of Transition To Knowledge-Based Economy By Taking Into Account The Social Responsibility Role," Proceedings of the International Conference Investments and Economic Recovery, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 19-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:efinvm:v:10:y:2011:i:1:p:19-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccasp.ase.ro/EFINV/2011/3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Weisbach, 2010. "Corporate Governance," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number weis10-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeffrey Cohen & Yuan Ding & Cédric Lesage & Hervé Stolowy, 2010. "Corporate Fraud and Managers’ Behavior: Evidence from the Press," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 271-315, September.
    2. Apostolov, Mico, 2011. "Governance and Enterprise Restructuring in Southeast Europe – gross domestic product and foreign direct investments," MPRA Paper 29102, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Joakim Sandberg, 2011. "Socially Responsible Investment and Fiduciary Duty: Putting the Freshfields Report into Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 143-162, June.
    4. Subrata Sarkar & Jayati Sarkar, 2010. "Auditor and Audit Committee Independence in India," Working Papers id:3117, eSocialSciences.
    5. Kee Chung & Jangkoo Kang & Joon-Seok Kim, 2011. "Tick size, market structure, and market quality," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 57-81, January.
    6. Apostolov, Mico, 2011. "Governance and Enterprise Restructuring - the case of Macedonia," MPRA Paper 29098, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Tran Ngoc Huy, DInh, 2011. "The Summarized Evaluation of The US and Latin America Corporate Governance Standards After Financial Crisis, Corporate Scandals and Manipulation," MPRA Paper 27898, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Jan 2011.
    8. Miriam Schwartz-Ziv & Michael Weisbach, 2011. "What do Boards Really Do? Evidence from Minutes of Board Meetings," NBER Working Papers 17509, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Foreman-Peck, James & Hannah, Leslie, 2011. "Extreme Divorce: the Managerial Revolution in UK Companies before 1914," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2011/21, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    10. David Ling & Milena Petrova, 2011. "Why Do REITs Go Private? Differences in Target Characteristics, Acquirer Motivations, and Wealth Effects in Public and Private Acquisitions," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 99-129, July.
    11. Chris Mallin & Kean Ow-Yong, 2010. "The UK Alternative Investment Market – Ethical Dimensions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 223-239, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:efinvm:v:10:y:2011:i:1:p:19-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.