IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/compca/v10y2014i1p56-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee Selection Methods In Romania: Popularity And Applicant Reactions

Author

Listed:
  • Septimiu-Rare? SZABO

    (Management Doctoral School, Administration and Public Management Faculty, Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

This study assessed the prevalence of, and applicants’ reactions to 21 different employee selection methods. Past studies on this topic have focused mainly on countries in Western Europe. This research investigated a sample of 142 Romanian respondents using a postal survey. The most popular selection methods used by Romanian organizations were found to be CVs, ability tests and interviews. In contrast, applicants most favor work-samples, followed by ability tests, interviews, CVs and personality tests. Their perception of astrology, graphology, personal contacts and modern selection instruments, was negative. These results are similar to those reported from studies in other countries suggesting that Romanian job candidates do not differ greatly in their reactions to these selection methods from their European counterparts. The study shows that Romanian employers predominantly use selection methods that are perceived positively by candidates.

Suggested Citation

  • Septimiu-Rare? SZABO, 2014. "Employee Selection Methods In Romania: Popularity And Applicant Reactions," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 56-73, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:compca:v:10:y:2014:i:1:p:56-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.confcamp.ase.ro/2014/doc/S1/06%20Szabo.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:compca:v:10:y:2014:i:1:p:56-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Popescu Irina Ruxandra (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.