IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/smmscn/s20210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Experience Of Assessing The Effectiveness Of Public Management
[Международный Опыт Оценки Эффективности Государственного Управления]

Author

Listed:
  • Pivovarova Olga (Пивоварова О.В.)

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation)

Abstract

The article analyzes the existing approaches and methods to assess the effectiveness of public management in the world practice. The quality management model Common Assessment Framework (CAF) and the Russian EPUS (Effective Public Service) created on its basis are analyzed, advantages and disadvantages, prerequisites necessary for the successful implementation of these models in Russian realities are highlighted. The integral Governance research indicator country snapshot (GRICS) and its components are considered, the graphical analysis of the Russian Federation's position in this rating in 2002-2018 are conducted. The features of the assessment of the Opacity index and the Public Integrity Index are investigated. The key disadvantages of methods for assessing the effectiveness of public management are justified and highlighted: ambiguous nature and complexity of measurement due to the lack of information base of the indicators used, internal unavailability of the public management system and subjective approach to the assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Pivovarova Olga (Пивоварова О.В.), 2020. "International Experience Of Assessing The Effectiveness Of Public Management [Международный Опыт Оценки Эффективности Государственного Управления]," State and Municipal Management Scholar Notes, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 80-86.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:smmscn:s20210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/smmscn/s20210.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:smmscn:s20210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.