IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/mngiss/m24101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing ‘trust’ concepts in political sociology and sociology of governance
[Сравнение Концептов «Доверия» В Политической Социологии И Социологии Управления]

Author

Listed:
  • Vedenin, Vladimir (Веденин, Владимир)

    (State Academic University of Humanities)

Abstract

Introduction. This article systematizes, analyzes and compares the concepts of trust in two sectoral sociologies: management sociology and political sociology. As an analysis of literature sources has shown, such a comparison has not yet been made by anyone from the scientific community. The author attempted to separate the concept of trust in order to demonstrate their substantive diversity. Although many researchers have already covered the topic of trust, few of them have considered the complex nature of measuring and classifying trust. Most authors exploring the issue of trust do not categorize it across scientific disciplines, which creates methodological differences that can disrupt the research process and lead to incorrect results. Methodology and methods. In this section of the article, the author, using general scientific methods of comparison and analysis, attempted to theoretically and methodologically separate the problem of trust. The basis is the classical theories of the study of trust, which are used by scientists when developing and studying the problem of trust in their fields of science. Results. In the current part of our article, we showed a comparison of two concepts of trust, based on the works by domestic authors in the field of studying the sociology of management and political sociology, as well as on the conducted research. Conclusions. There are several differences in the ‘active-passive’ trust dyad, consisting primarily in further analysis of sociological subjects. In the case of political sociology, these are the consequences of political decisions related to citizens, and in the sociology of management, changes in the processes of making and implementing management decisions, as well as changes in the management process itself. In the ‘personal-institutional’ dyad trust, both types are studied in political sociology, while in the sociology of management personal trust is not studied for a number of reasons. It should also be noted that political sociology is focused on diagnosing the problem of trust in society, and the sociology of management, in turn, offers developed scientific and practical technologies for solving these problems. This clearly demonstrates the difference in approaches to the conceptual study of trust in sociology.

Suggested Citation

  • Vedenin, Vladimir (Веденин, Владимир), 2024. "Comparing ‘trust’ concepts in political sociology and sociology of governance [Сравнение Концептов «Доверия» В Политической Социологии И Социологии Управления]," Voprosy upravleniya / Management Issues, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, pages 5-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:mngiss:m24101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/mngiss/m24101.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:mngiss:m24101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.