IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecosci/es1817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of the place of the Russian Federation by specific weight in the total number of articles on clinical medicine, indexed in the Web of Science
[Оценка места Российской Федерации по удельному весу в общем числе статей по клинической медицине, индексируемых в Web of Science]

Author

Listed:
  • Kurakova, N.G. (Куракова. Н.Г.)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Tsvetkova, L.A. (Цветкова, Л.А.)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Cherchenko, O.В. (Черченко, О.В.)

    (Directorate of State Scientific and Technical Programmes)

Abstract

The place of the Russian Federation by specific weight in the total number of articles in the field of clinical medicine, indexed in the international database Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) is determined. It is shown that if you strictly comply with the wording of the target of the National Project “Science” and assume that correctly all publications on clinical medicine, indexed in WoS CC, refer to the priority “transition to personalized medicine, high-tech healthcare and health protection technologies, including the expense of rational use of drugs (primarily antibacterial “, then the basic value of this target should be defined as the 36th place in the world. For eniya Russian Federation, one of the five leading countries in the publication activity in the field of clinical medicine Russian professional medical community needs to increase by 13 times the number of articles indexed in the WoS CC, to surpass Japan’s figures, which occupies the 5th position at the end of 2017.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurakova, N.G. (Куракова. Н.Г.) & Tsvetkova, L.A. (Цветкова, Л.А.) & Cherchenko, O.В. (Черченко, О.В.), 2018. "Estimation of the place of the Russian Federation by specific weight in the total number of articles on clinical medicine, indexed in the Web of Science [Оценка места Российской Федерации по удельн," Economy of science, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 244-260, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecosci:es1817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecosci/es1817.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Kurakova & L. Tsvetkova & O. Eremchenko., 2013. "Scientometric Parameters of Russian Economic Science: General State and the Evaluation of Thesis Boards," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petrov, A.N. (Петров, А.Н.) & Kurakova, N.G. (Куракова, Н.Г.), 2019. "Problems of achieving systematic targets of the national project «Science» [Проблемы Достижения Системности Целевых Показателей Национального Проекта «Наука»]," Economy of science, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 5, pages 4-18, April.
    2. A. N. Petrov & N. G. Kurakova, 2019. "Problems of achieving systematic targets of the national project «Science»," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 5(1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N. G. Kurakova & L. A. Tsvetkova & O. V. Cherchenko, 2018. "Estimation of the place of the Russian Federation by specific weight in the total number of articles on clinical medicine, indexed in the Web of Science," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 4(4).
    2. Volkova, O., 2016. "Do Visual Culture Revolutions Affect Accounting Practices?," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 54-82.
    3. Rubinstein, A., 2016. "Ranking of Russian Economic Journals: The Scientific Method or "Numbers Game"," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 162-175.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    clinical medicine; publications; share; Web of Science; national project “Science”; target indicators;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecosci:es1817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.