IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep2017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cryptocurrency Market: Overreaction to News and Herd Instincts
[Рынок Криптовалют: Сверхреакция На Новости И Стадные Инстинкты]

Author

Listed:
  • Malkina, Marina (Малкина, Марина)

    (Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod)

  • Ovchinnikov, Vyacheslav (Овчинников, Вячеслав)

    (Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod)

Abstract

We studied the specific properties of the cryptocurrency market. Guided by the concept of implied volatility, we investigated the asymmetric reaction of the market to news. Based on the concept of realized volatility, we verified the hypothesis of herding behavior in the market. To test the properties of the market, we used a combination of methods, starting from the analysis of statistics of search queries, interpreted as proxies of information demand from professional market participants and the “wide crowd”, and ending with advanced Markov-Switching GARCH models and heterogeneous autoregressive models of realized volatility (HAR-RV-J-models). As a result, we found various types of asymmetric reactions of the cryptocurrency market to news related to both the general direction of its dynamics (growth or decrease) and the amplitude of return fluctuations (high or low volatility). During the upward price rally and overheating of the market, investors deliberately avoided the bad news; thereby the asymmetry in the cryptocurrency market was inverse (to the adopted leverage effect). On the contrary, during the downward price rally, market participants exhibited an overreaction to bad news. In addition, the asymmetric reaction to the news observed during the period of low market volatility actually disappeared when the amplitude of cryptocurrency return volatility increased. The behavior of short-term investors was also varied in the study period. While during the growth of the market, small speculators were more likely to follow their own trading strategies, during the hype they borrowed the trading practices of the largest players. We also revealed the effect of training among small investors: over time, they became less prone to provocations from large players, which did not allow the 2019 rally to surpass its counterpart in 2017 in terms of both return oscillations and duration.

Suggested Citation

  • Malkina, Marina (Малкина, Марина) & Ovchinnikov, Vyacheslav (Овчинников, Вячеслав), 2020. "Cryptocurrency Market: Overreaction to News and Herd Instincts [Рынок Криптовалют: Сверхреакция На Новости И Стадные Инстинкты]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 3, pages 74-105, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep2017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep2017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torben G. Andersen & Tim Bollerslev & Francis X. Diebold, 2007. "Roughing It Up: Including Jump Components in the Measurement, Modeling, and Forecasting of Return Volatility," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 89(4), pages 701-720, November.
    2. Corbet, Shaen & Lucey, Brian & Yarovaya, Larisa, 2018. "Datestamping the Bitcoin and Ethereum bubbles," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 81-88.
    3. Al-Yahyaee, Khamis Hamed & Mensi, Walid & Yoon, Seong-Min, 2018. "Efficiency, multifractality, and the long-memory property of the Bitcoin market: A comparative analysis with stock, currency, and gold markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 228-234.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed, Walid M.A., 2020. "Is there a risk-return trade-off in cryptocurrency markets? The case of Bitcoin," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Ahmed, Walid M.A. & Al Mafrachi, Mustafa, 2021. "Do higher-order realized moments matter for cryptocurrency returns?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 483-499.
    3. Ata Assaf & Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana & Khaled Mokni, 2022. "True or spurious long memory in the cryptocurrency markets: evidence from a multivariate test and other Whittle estimation methods," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1543-1570, September.
    4. Flori, Andrea, 2019. "News and subjective beliefs: A Bayesian approach to Bitcoin investments," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 336-356.
    5. Manahov, Viktor & Urquhart, Andrew, 2021. "The efficiency of Bitcoin: A strongly typed genetic programming approach to smart electronic Bitcoin markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Chevapatrakul, Thanaset & Mascia, Danilo V., 2019. "Detecting overreaction in the Bitcoin market: A quantile autoregression approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 371-377.
    7. Muhammad Owais Qarni & Saiqb Gulzar, 2021. "Portfolio diversification benefits of alternative currency investment in Bitcoin and foreign exchange markets," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-37, December.
    8. Shuyu Zhang & Walter Aerts & Dunli Zhang & Zishan Chen, 2022. "Positive tone and initial coin offering," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2237-2266, June.
    9. Svogun, Daniel & Bazán-Palomino, Walter, 2022. "Technical analysis in cryptocurrency markets: Do transaction costs and bubbles matter?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Pyo, Sujin & Lee, Jaewook, 2020. "Do FOMC and macroeconomic announcements affect Bitcoin prices?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    11. Pradipta Kumar Sahoo & Dinabandhu Sethi, 2024. "Market efficiency of the cryptocurrencies: Some new evidence based on price–volume relationship," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1569-1580, April.
    12. Feng, Lingbing & Qi, Jiajun & Lucey, Brian, 2024. "Enhancing cryptocurrency market volatility forecasting with daily dynamic tuning strategy," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    13. Mensi, Walid & Al-Yahyaee, Khamis Hamed & Kang, Sang Hoon, 2019. "Structural breaks and double long memory of cryptocurrency prices: A comparative analysis from Bitcoin and Ethereum," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 222-230.
    14. Wang, Pengfei & Zhang, Wei & Li, Xiao & Shen, Dehua, 2019. "Is cryptocurrency a hedge or a safe haven for international indices? A comprehensive and dynamic perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-18.
    15. Sinda Hadhri, 2023. "How does Bitcoin react to economic discomfort? Evidence from the economic misery index," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 43(3), pages 1235-1253.
    16. Hachmi Ben Ameur & Zied Ftiti & Waël Louhichi, 2024. "Interconnectedness of cryptocurrency markets: an intraday analysis of volatility spillovers based on realized volatility decomposition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(2), pages 757-779, October.
    17. Aurelio F. Bariviera & Ignasi Merediz‐Solà, 2021. "Where Do We Stand In Cryptocurrencies Economic Research? A Survey Based On Hybrid Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 377-407, April.
    18. Yang, Jen-Wei & Chiu, Shih-Yung & Yen, Kuang-Chieh, 2023. "Does the realized distribution-based measure dominate particular moments? Evidence from cryptocurrency markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    19. Antonakakis, Nikolaos & Chatziantoniou, Ioannis & Gabauer, David, 2019. "Cryptocurrency market contagion: Market uncertainty, market complexity, and dynamic portfolios," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 37-51.
    20. Alaoui, Marwane El & Bouri, Elie & Roubaud, David, 2019. "Bitcoin price–volume: A multifractal cross-correlation approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cryptocurrencies; market (in)efficiency; overreaction to news; asymmetry effect; herding behavior; learning effect.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G02 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep2017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.