IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ec2416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengths and Weaknesses of Self-Employment and Platform Work in Russia
[Преимущества И Риски Самозанятости И Платформенной Занятости]

Author

Listed:
  • Bychkov, Dmitry (Бычков, Дмитрий)

    (NIFI Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation)

  • Grishina, Elena (Гришина, Елена)

    (NIFI Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation)

  • Loktyukhina, Natalia (Локтюхина, Наталия)

    (NIFI Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation
    Academy of Labor and Social Relations)

  • Feoktistova, Olesya (Феоктистова, Олеся)

    (NIFI Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation)

Abstract

The paper assesses the risks incurred through self-employment and platform work in Russia, which arise because the basic mechanisms for mandatory social insurance are lacking for these workers. As part of their research methodology, the authors used expert assessments based on extensive interviews with the management of large digital platforms and with representatives of trade unions, government authorities, and insurance companies. The authors also relied on the profiles regarding the forms of employment under study using data generated by the Federal Tax Service, the Federal Statistical Service, and a telephone survey of research staff of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration and CEOs of a number of large digital platforms. The authors assess the risks involved in self-employment and platform work as they relate to the characteristics of the employed and to commercial risks, including those encountered by insurance companies that issue policies to self-employed and platform workers. A separate assessment was carried out for exposure to risks from implementing various policy scenarios - 1) bringing self-employed and platform workers into the compulsory social insurance system; 2) restricting them to non-state social insurance; or 3) requiring platforms to provide social guarantees to their employees or act as social insurance agents for their workers. The authors conclude that it is impractical to provide self-employed and platform workers with the same kind of social security that formally hired labor enjoys. A fundamentally new approach to providing social guarantees to the self-employed and platform workers would be necessary to minimize their social risks, and any such approach would have to address the risks and challenges identified in this study

Suggested Citation

  • Bychkov, Dmitry (Бычков, Дмитрий) & Grishina, Elena (Гришина, Елена) & Loktyukhina, Natalia (Локтюхина, Наталия) & Feoktistova, Olesya (Феоктистова, Олеся), 2024. "Strengths and Weaknesses of Self-Employment and Platform Work in Russia [Преимущества И Риски Самозанятости И Платформенной Занятости]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, issue 4, pages 60-83.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ec2416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ec2416.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tax on professional income; social insurance for the self-employed; new forms of employment; composition of employment; independent workers; own-account workers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ec2416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.