IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arjsds/v1y2011i4p144-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organics Olympiad 2011: Global Indices of Leadership in Organic Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • John Paull

Abstract

Organic agriculture is now a worldwide phenomenon which is practiced in 160 countries. The Organics Olympiad presents 12 indices of global organics leadership, each at three levels. It yields 26 countries as global organics leaders, and reveals that organics leadership is diversely distributed across countries, large and small, rich and poor, developed and less so, as well as across linguistic and cultural barriers. Australia leads the world in organic agriculture hectares, Finland leads in organic wild culture hectares, China leads in organic aquaculture hectares, and Portugal leads in organic forest hectares. Germany leads in biodynamic hectares, as well as with the number of members of the International Federation of Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), and in the publishing of organics research papers. India is in the lead position for the number of organic producers, the Falkland Islands (Malvinas) leads in terms of the percentage of agricultural land dedicated as organic, and Denmark leads with the value of organics consumption per capita. Uruguay leads in the relative increase in organic hectares over the past decade, and Japan leads in the number of organics certifiers. The overall global organics leaders, on the basis of aggregated scores, are Germany, India and Denmark, in positions one, two and three, respectively. The successful global diffusion of organics, as demonstrated in this study, means that leadership lessons are available from a diversity of social, geographical, political, and ecological situations for both existing and aspiring organics leaders.

Suggested Citation

  • John Paull, 2011. "Organics Olympiad 2011: Global Indices of Leadership in Organic Agriculture," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 1(4), pages 144-150.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arjsds:v:1:y:2011:i:4:p:144-150
    DOI: 10.22610/jsds.v1i4.638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jsds/article/view/638/638
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jsds/article/view/638
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/jsds.v1i4.638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sunantar Setboonsarng, 2009. "Does Organic Agriculture Lead to Better Health among Organic and Conventional Farmers in Thailand? An Investigation of Health Expenditure among Organic and Conventional Farmers in Thailand," Working Papers id:1844, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xanat Vargas Meza & Han Woo Park, 2016. "Organic Products in Mexico and South Korea on Twitter," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 587-603, May.
    2. John Paull, 2011. "The Uptake of Organic Agriculture: A Decade of Worldwide Development," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 2(3), pages 111-120.
    3. John Paull, 2016. "Organics Olympiad 2016: Global Indices of Leadership in Organic Agriculture," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 7(2), pages 79-87.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucas David & Michaƫl Dambrun & Rosie Harrington & Michel Streith & Audrey Michaud, 2021. "Psychological and Physical Health of Organic and Conventional Farmers: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arjsds:v:1:y:2011:i:4:p:144-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jsds .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.