IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v9y2017i3p40-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Competence, Professionalism and Experience on Auditor Professional Judgment in Evaluation of Audit Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Ishak Amsari
  • Nurmalasari Rasibo

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether competence, professionalism and experience affect auditor’s professional judgment of Supreme Audit Board of Republic of Indonesia in South Sulawesi province in evaluation of audit evidence, either partially or simultaneously. This study used a correlational study design with a questionnaire instrument as a tool for measuring the competence, professionalism and experience variables. The method of analysis was used to test the hypothesis is multiple linear regression, where analysis is based on data from 40 respondents who have completed all the statements and questionnaires. The results of this study indicate that the competence, professionalism and experience simultaneously and partially affect positively the auditor’s professional judgment of Supreme Audit Board of Republic of Indonesia in South Sulawesi province in evaluation of audit evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Ishak Amsari & Nurmalasari Rasibo, 2017. "The Effect of Competence, Professionalism and Experience on Auditor Professional Judgment in Evaluation of Audit Evidence," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 9(3), pages 40-46.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:40-46
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v9i3.1777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/1777/1464
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/1777
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v9i3.1777?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:40-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.