IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v6y2014i4p207-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Glyphosate Market in Thailand: Opportunities and Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Adisak Suvittawat

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the opportunities and challenges of the glyphosate market in Thailand, which is affected by product registration laws, demand, supply, and product positioning and price segmentation. The methodology of this study consists of primary data from 2013 market surveys both at dealer and farmer levels and secondary data collected from 2009-2013 using descriptive methods. The results show that herbicides, fungicides and insecticides werethetop three kinds of imported pesticides used for crop production in Thailand from 2009-2013. Herbicide imports increased fromUS$291.83 million (MUSD) and 53,615.20 tons in 2009, to 352.93 MUSD and 60,231.52 tons in 2012. Glyphosate was the leading pesticide import in 2012, in cost and amount, at 88.13 MUSD and 19,721 tons. Many glyphosate brands compete in a price-segmented market. Monsanto’s Roundup brand is the most expensive, at 18.12-18.75USD per four liters (/4 L). Brands such as Ecomax are priced in the medium range, at13.75-16.25 USD/4 L. This segment has other brands too, such as Market and Popular, and they are sold in different regions. Other brands are in the lowest price range, at 1.25-13.45 USD/4 L. Thailand has not yet approved genetically modified (GM) crops that can tolerate glyphosate, so the market for glyphosate is very limited at the moment. If the Thai government approves GM crops, the glyphosate market will have more opportunity for growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Adisak Suvittawat, 2014. "Glyphosate Market in Thailand: Opportunities and Challenges," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 6(4), pages 207-211.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:207-211
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v6i4.1116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/1116/1116
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/1116
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v6i4.1116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:207-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.