Author
Abstract
In the national economy system, the subsystems of agricultural production (ASPEFV) and of food production (PABT) are “anchored” to other sectors by a series of “backward linkages” and “forward linkages”. Representing, in fact, the intermediary consumption intensity in final production, the backward linkages coefficients per total national economy had a strong descending trend in the period 1989-1998, ranging from 0.653 (maximum level in 1989) to 0.537 (minimum level in 1998). As compared to the total economy average, 34 of the 54 coefficients of backward linkages referring to the transition years 1990-1998 (62.9%) are larger than unit, referring to four sectors: food industry (PABT) and the rest of branches (RRAM) with 9 coefficients each, on the one hand; the textiles and ready-made clothes (TEXC) and hotels, restaurants and tourism agencies (HRAT) with 8 coefficients each, on the other hand. At the same time, only 16 coefficients of the forward linkages out of the 54 calculated for the transition years 1990-1998 (29.6%) are larger than unit and refer to two sectors: agriculture (ASPEFV) – 7 coefficients and the rest of branches (RRAM) – 9 coefficients. One may notice the presence of strong backward linkages in a number of four branches of the six branches considered, out of which food industry can be easily explained, if we consider that agriculture is the main upstream supplier of food industry. Also, one may observe the presence of strong linkages in only two of the six branches, out of which agriculture can be easily explained if we consider that the main beneficiary in the downstream sector of agriculture is food industry. While agriculture (ASPEFV) is found in the type III of linkages (weak backward linkages but strong forward linkages) in eight of the ten years of the investigated period and in the type IV of linkages in the remaining two years, food industry is found in type II of linkages (strong backward but weak forward). Per total national economy, the average driving backward coefficients (which is similar to that of forward coefficients) for the period 1990-1998 was 2.355; this means that in this transition period an economic activity unit induced by about 22% less economic activity as compared to 1989. Both main components of the agrifood sector (agriculture – ASPEFV and food industry – PABT) present a considerable decline in the driving effects; their averages in the transition years are by 10.9% and 19.7%, respectively, below the corresponding levels of 1989 in agriculture and by 11.6% and 12.0% in the food industry. Agriculture would induce from 1.935 to 2.353 economic activity units in its upstream sector and from 2.464 to 2.903 units in its downstream sector. It means that, summing up the two driving effects, agriculture would induce more than 4.8 economic activity units, and food industry more than 4.7 units. Over the period 1989-1998, our economy mostly featured (39 out of 60 correlations, i.e. 65%) high driving backward power, where in 12 cases this was also accompanied by a high driving forward power (food industry – 2 cases, and the rest of branches – 10 cases), while in the other 27 cases a low driving forward power (food industry – 8 textile and ready-made clothes – 9, and hotels and restaurants – 10). At the same time, agriculture may be characterized by a low driving backward power, but quite a strong driving forward power; by contrast, the trade features by a low driving forward power.
Suggested Citation
Toderoiu, Filon, 2003.
"The Agrifood Sector - Linkages And Driving Effects In The National Economy,"
Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 72-92, September.
Handle:
RePEc:rjr:romjef:v::y:2003:i:3:p:72-92
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rjr:romjef:v::y:2003:i:3:p:72-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corina Saman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipacaro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.