IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rje/bellje/v5y1974ispringp38-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rate of Return Regulation and Efficiency in Production: An Empirical Test of the Averch-Johnson Thesis

Author

Listed:
  • Robert M. Spann

Abstract

Eleven years ago, Harvey Averch and Leland Johnson demonstrated that firms subject to rate of return regulation have an incentive to use inputs in proportions that differ from the cost minimizing input levels. In the intervening years, numerous theoretical papers have appeared in the literature refining their original thesis but, until recently there has been little or no empirical testing of this proposition. In this paper a test of the Averch-Johnson thesis using the trans-log production function is derived. The test is applied to data from regulated electric utilities and the Averch-Johnson thesis is confirmed.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert M. Spann, 1974. "Rate of Return Regulation and Efficiency in Production: An Empirical Test of the Averch-Johnson Thesis," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 5(1), pages 38-52, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:5:y:1974:i:spring:p:38-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0005-8556%28197421%295%3A1%3C38%3ARORRAE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-L&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:5:y:1974:i:spring:p:38-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rje.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.