IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rje/bellje/v4y1973ispringp101-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Decision Analysis with Multiple Objectives: the Mexico City Airport

Author

Listed:
  • Ralph L. Keeney

Abstract

This paper reports an analysis done for the Secretaria de Obras Publicas (Ministry of Public Works) of Mexico to help select the most "effective" strategy for developing the airport facilities of the Mexico City metropolitan area to insure quality air service for the remainder of the century. Effectiveness is a complex function including attributes of cost, safety, capacity of the airport facilities, noise levels, social disruption, and access times. A decision analytic model was used for evaluating strategies. The attributes were adapted to account for impacts over time, and probability density functions and a utility function were assessed over the six attributes. Details of these assessments are given. The results and implications of the analyses are discussed. A unique aspect of the study involved the assessment of a multiattribute utility function and its use to aid an important policy decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Ralph L. Keeney, 1973. "A Decision Analysis with Multiple Objectives: the Mexico City Airport," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 4(1), pages 101-117, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:4:y:1973:i:spring:p:101-117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0005-8556%28197321%294%3A1%3C101%3AADAWMO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fry, Phillip C. & Rinks, Dan B. & Ringuest, Jeffrey L., 1996. "Comparing the predictive validity of alternatively assessed multi-attribute preference models when relevant decision attributes are missing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 599-609, November.
    2. Hardaker, J. B., 1982. "Fundamental Aspects Of Risk And Uncertainty In Agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 21(2), October.
    3. Willem K. Brauers, 2002. "The multiplicative representation for multiple objectives optimization with an application for arms procurement," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(4), pages 327-340, June.
    4. Jacquillat, Alexandre & Odoni, Amedeo R., 2018. "A roadmap toward airport demand and capacity management," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 168-185.
    5. Canbolat, Yavuz Burak & Chelst, Kenneth & Garg, Nitin, 2007. "Combining decision tree and MAUT for selecting a country for a global manufacturing facility," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 312-325, June.
    6. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    7. Hauser, John R. & Urban, Glen L., 1975. "A normative methodology for modeling consumer response to innovation," Working papers 785-75., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    8. Yang, Zhongzhen & Yu, Shunan & Notteboom, Theo, 2016. "Airport location in multiple airport regions (MARs): The role of land and airside accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 98-110.
    9. Sinden, Jack A., 1980. "On The Derivation Of Indifference Maps For Estimating Consumer'S Surplus: Reply," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 24(3), pages 1-7, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:4:y:1973:i:spring:p:101-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rje.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.