IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rje/bellje/v13y1982ispringp234-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Sustainability Concept under Alternative Behavioral Assumptions

Author

Listed:
  • Gunter Knieps
  • Ingo Vogelsang

Abstract

The main results of the sustainability literature on natural monopolies (for example, Panzar and Willig (1977)), are shown to depend on the Bertrand conjecture. First, for the natural monopoly case we prove that industry configurations that are sustainable in the sense of Willig (1980) are equivalent to special kinds of Bertrand equilibria. Second, we show that sustainability under the Bertrand assumption does not necessarily imply sustainability under the Cournot assumption and vice versa. The general efficiency results that have been obtained for sustainable configurations no longer hold under the Cournot assumption. On the other hand, von Stackelberg behavior guarantees sustainability and an efficient industry structure, though not necessarily efficient pricing. Third, under the Bertrand assumption, entry can be deterred if sunk costs comprise a sufficiently large fraction of total costs, but this result fails to hold under the Cournot assumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Gunter Knieps & Ingo Vogelsang, 1982. "The Sustainability Concept under Alternative Behavioral Assumptions," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(1), pages 234-241, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:13:y:1982:i:spring:p:234-241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0361-915X%28198221%2913%3A1%3C234%3ATSCUAB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-F&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balletta, Luigi & Tesoriere, Antonio, 2016. "Strictly convex variable cost does not imply U-shaped average cost," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 766-770.
    2. Dos Santos Ferreira, Rodolphe & Dufourt, Frederic, 2006. "Free entry and business cycles under the influence of animal spirits," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 311-328, March.
    3. Günter Knieps, 2006. "Competition in the Post-Trade Markets: A Network Economic Analysis of the Securities Business," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 45-60, March.
    4. Tesoriere, Antonio, 2017. "Stackelberg equilibrium with many leaders and followers. The case of zero fixed costs," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 102-117.
    5. Tesoriere, Antonio, 2017. "Stackelberg equilibrium with multiple firms and setup costs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 86-102.
    6. David Encaoua, 1986. "Réglementation et concurrence : quelques éléments de théorie économique," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 76(5), pages 7-46.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:13:y:1982:i:spring:p:234-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rje.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.