IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rje/bellje/v13y1982iautumnp555-560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-Spreading Properties of Common Tax and Contract Instruments

Author

Listed:
  • J.K. Sebenius
  • P.J.E. Stan

Abstract

Many tax systems require payment by means of fixed fees, percentages of gross revenues (royalties or ad valorem taxes), or percentages of net income (profit shares or income taxes). Even when payments due under such instruments have the same expected value, their risk-spreading properties may differ. For equal expected levies, profit-sharing is often ranked as the most effective means of risk-spreading, followed by royalty payments, and finally by fixed fees. When revenues and costs are both uncertain, however, we demonstrate that this common risk-ranking is not generally valid and discuss reasons for its breakdown.

Suggested Citation

  • J.K. Sebenius & P.J.E. Stan, 1982. "Risk-Spreading Properties of Common Tax and Contract Instruments," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(2), pages 555-560, Autumn.
    • Handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:13:y:1982:i:autumn:p:555-560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0361-915X%28198223%2913%3A2%3C555%3ARPOCTA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Polinsky, A Mitchell, 1987. "Fixed Price versus Spot Price Contracts: A Study in Risk Allocation," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 27-46, Spring.
    2. Smith, James L., 2013. "Issues in extractive resource taxation: A review of research methods and models," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 320-331.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:13:y:1982:i:autumn:p:555-560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rje.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.