IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/zfioef/0015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Der Fall Heinisch im europäischen Kontext

Author

Listed:
  • Albrecht, Achim

    (Westfälische Hochschule)

Abstract

Whistleblowing hat im internationalen und europäischen Rahmen in den letzten Jahren zahlreiche arbeitsrechtliche, datenschutzrechtliche und strafrechtliche Regelungen erfahren. In der Bundesrepublik Deutschland fehlt eine gesetzliche Normierung und Hinweisgeber stehen noch immer in Gefahr, ihren Arbeitsplatz zu verlieren. Der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, EGMR, hat am 21.7.2011 entschieden, dass die fristlose Kündigung einer Mitarbeiterin nach erfolgter Strafanzeige gegen ihren Arbeitgeber we g e n Ve r s t o ß e s g e g e n d i e F r e i h e i t d e r Meinungsäußerung, Art. 10 EMRK, ungerechtfertigt war und sich dabei dezidiert mit der bislang geübten R e c h t s p r e c h u n g d e r d e u t s c h e n Arbeitsgerichtsbarkeit auseinander gesetzt. Dabei musste der EGMR zwischen den verschiedenen Interessen der beteiligten Parteien abwägen und hat eine Reihe von Kriterien aufgestellt, die in Deutschland in vergleichbaren Fällen künftig Beachtung finden werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Albrecht, Achim, 2015. "Der Fall Heinisch im europäischen Kontext," Zeitschrift für interdisziplinäre ökonomische Forschung, Allensbach Hochschule, issue 1, pages 4-8, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:zfioef:0015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quality Management; Research; Literature;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • K30 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:zfioef:0015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Petia Popova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/allhsde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.