IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/statec/0104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Issues of Interaction between BRICS and RCEP in the Framework of Global Economic Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Kharlanov, Aleksey S.

    (Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia)

  • Ukubassova, Galiya S.

    (Esil University)

Abstract

Introduction. Studying the issues of BRICS and RCEP integration is relevant, since in a changing world economy with traditional centers of power losing their dominant role, the integration of these associations can become an important factor for the formation of new economic and political alliances. The article aims to analyze and discuss the issues arising in the interaction of coalitions (BRICS and RCEP) in the context of global economic integration. Materials and methods. The materials were publications in peer-reviewed journals on international relations, economics and political science (Environmental Science and Pollution Research, etc.), official documents and reports: reports and documents published by the BRICS, RCEP and other international organizations. Results. The authors analyzed data on trade turnover between the BRICS countries and the rest of the world, as well as the share of trade of the member countries within the framework of the association from their total trade turnover. The analysis of the trade turnover of the RCEP countries as of 2019 (in billions of US dollars) showed that the bulk of the foreign trade of the RCEP member countries is with other countries that are members of the association; notably, China is the largest partner for most of the bloc’s states. For the majority of countries, the share of foreign trade with other residents of the EMEA is more than 50%, which indicates a high degree of developed trade relations and integration between them. The exceptions are China (intra-bloc trade share of 30%), which is explained by the scale of the Chinese economy itself and its foreign trade links; Singapore (42%), which comes from its specialization in services and financial activities; and Japan (47%), the level of which is quite close to that of other countries in the bloc. Thus, the average level of intra-bloc trade is about 44%. Consequently, the countries’ relations are very strong and reflect their desire to deepen integration and develop the economies of the region. Conclusion. The trade relations within the BRICS-RCEP interaction are at a very advanced level and further transit to a higher level of integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Kharlanov, Aleksey S. & Ukubassova, Galiya S., 2022. "Issues of Interaction between BRICS and RCEP in the Framework of Global Economic Integration," Economic Consultant, Roman I. Ostapenko, vol. 3(2), pages 13-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:statec:0104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://statecounsellor.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/pdf_220202.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    BRICS; RCEP; Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F12 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies; Fragmentation
    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:statec:0104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roman I. Ostapenko (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.