IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/jofipe/0090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial regulation of FinTech

Author

Listed:
  • Treleaven, Philip

    (University College London)

Abstract

Effective financial regulation is clearly crucial to innovation and the future success of the financial services industry and, in specific, FinTech. 1 There are also unprecedented opportunities for reforming regulation and also creating new businesses in the process. Examples include: using “big data” regulatory online reporting and analytics to streamline reporting; and stimulating a new generation of “RegTech” companies to provide the regulatory/compliance software. This paper reviews the current regulatory pressures faced by the financial services industry, and discusses new “big data” approaches to regulating financial companies. Three actions are highlighted: a) an open-source platform for FinTech regulation, b) a regulatory XML to help standardize reporting and c) an overarching international standards body. Lastly, we examine responses by the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), such as Project Innovate.

Suggested Citation

  • Treleaven, Philip, 2015. "Financial regulation of FinTech," Journal of Financial Perspectives, EY Global FS Institute, vol. 3(3), pages 114-121.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:jofipe:0090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng, Hongfeng & Ji, Jiao & Sun, Hanwen & Xu, Haofeng, 2023. "Legal enforcement and fintech credit: International evidence," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 214-231.
    2. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Shahnawaz Khan & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2020. "FinTech, Blockchain and Islamic Finance: An Extensive Literature Review," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 65-86.
    3. Jorge Alberto Padilla Sánchez, 2019. "Crowdfunding. Análisis del marco regulatorio de la financiación colaborativa en Colombia," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1112.
    4. Xuan, Siyuan & Ge, Wenfeng & Yang, Ping & Zhang, Yunfeng, 2024. "Exploring digital finance, financial regulations and carbon emission nexus: New insight from resources efficiency, industrial structure and green innovation in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Gębski, Łukasz, 2021. "FinTech i FinReg - nowe wyzwania dla systemu regulacji rynku finansowego w Polsce i na świecie," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Albulena SHALA & Rezearta PERRI, 2022. "Regulatory barriers for fintech companies in Central and Eastern Europe," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13, pages 292-316, December.
    7. Tianlei Pi & Haoxuan Hu & Jingyi Lu & Xue Chen, 2022. "The Analysis of Fintech Risks in China: Based on Fuzzy Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Xinmin Liu & Xinjiang Wang & Wencheng Yu, 2023. "Opportunity or Challenge? Research on the Influence of Digital Finance on Digital Transformation of Agribusiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Bonga-Bonga, Lumengo & Kirsten, Frederich, 2024. "Renewable energy generation and financial market dynamics in Europe: a disaggregated approach," MPRA Paper 122461, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Ozili, Peterson K, 2020. "Contesting digital finance for the poor," MPRA Paper 101812, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Anil Savio Kavuri & Alistair Milne, 2019. "FinTech and the future of financial services: What are the research gaps?," CAMA Working Papers 2019-18, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    FinTech; financial regulations;

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:jofipe:0090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ms Alina Stefan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ey.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.