IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ecoint/0990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupation Status-Subjective Well-being Nexus: A Quantile Regression Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Biyase, Mduduzi

    (University of Johannesburg, School of Economics, South Africa)

  • Volschenk, Liza-Mari

    (University of Johannesburg, School of Economics, South Africa)

  • De Carvalho, Sheila

    (University of Johannesburg, School of Economics, South Africa)

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between occupation status and subjective well-being (SWB) in South Africa, an issue that has received almost no attention in this field, with data from the 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2017 waves of the National income Dynamics Study (NIDS). While the results based on the random effect ordered probit (REOP) suggest a positive relationship between occupation and SWB, the quantile regression estimates reveal a differential influence of occupation for individuals at different levels of the conditional SWB distribution. Specifically, the quantile regression reveals that while occupation status enters with an expected positive sign, its significant effect is mostly located in the lower to slightly upper part of the SWB distribution (Q25 and Q75). Thus, while our finding clearly supports the positive effect of occupation reported in the existing literature, the distributional influence is more nuanced, implying that the estimates derived from the standard estimators (such as REOP model) might underestimate this effect of occupation at these quantiles at the Q25. The effect of occupation on SWB is robust to the inclusion of interaction terms, such as the interactive effect between race and SWB. La relazione tra lo stato occupazionale e il benessere soggettivo: un’analisi di regressione quantilica In questo studio analizziamo per la prima volta la relazione tra stato occupazionale e benessere soggettivo in Sud Africa, tramite dati NIDS (National Income Dynamics Study) relativi al 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014 e 2017. Mentre i risultati basati su REOP (Random Effect Ordered Probit) suggeriscono una relazione positiva tra occupazione e benessere soggettivo, le stime della regressione quantilica mostrano che lo stato di occupazione ha un’influenza diversa sugli individui a seconda del loro livello di benessere soggettivo. Precisamente, la regressione quantilica evidenzia che mentre lo stato occupazionale mostra un segno positivo, il suo effetto significativo è per lo più situato nell’intervallo Q25 e Q75 della distribuzione del benessere soggettivo. Quindi, mentre questo risultato è chiaramente coerente con l’effetto positivo dell’occupazione descritto dalla letteratura esistente, l’influenza distributiva è più sfumata in quanto le stime ottenute con il modello REOP potrebbero sottostimare l’effetto dell’occupazione nel quantile Q25. Gli effetti dell’occupazione sul benessere soggettivo risultano robusti se si includono termini di interazione come l’effetto interattivo tra razza e benessere soggettivo.

Suggested Citation

  • Biyase, Mduduzi & Volschenk, Liza-Mari & De Carvalho, Sheila, 2025. "Occupation Status-Subjective Well-being Nexus: A Quantile Regression Analysis," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 78(1), pages 147-178.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iei1946.it/article/969/occupation-status-subjective-well-being-nexus-a-quantile-regression-analysis
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    NIDS; Occupation; Quantile Regression; REOP; SWB;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure
    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Procopio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cacogit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.