IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ecoint/0393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Official Intervention in the Foreign Exchange Market and the Random Walk Behavior of Exchange Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Homaifar, Ghassem A.

    (Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Economics and Finance)

  • Zietz , Joachim

    (Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Economics and Finance)

Abstract

Official intervention in the foreign exchange rate market can prevent the exchange rate from behaving as a random walk. Since central banks have routinely intervened in the foreign exchange market, empirical tests should reject the random walk hypothesis. A number of alternative statistical tests are employed to examine this hypothesis. The empirical results reveal that all but the Dickey-Fuller tests flatly reject the random walk hypothesis for all currencies tested. Given the low statistical power of the Dickey-Fuller tests, the empirical evidence points toward a rejection of the random walk hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Homaifar, Ghassem A. & Zietz , Joachim, 1995. "Official Intervention in the Foreign Exchange Market and the Random Walk Behavior of Exchange Rates," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 48(3), pages 359-373.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Procopio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cacogit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.