Author
Abstract
This paper seeks to identify the source of the persistent gap between Canadian and US unemployment rates and why the gap has widened more for women than for men. A graphical method is proposed to distinguish between employment shocks and changes in the activity rate. The labor market is also separated between categories of workers having different levels of attachment to the labor force, that is between men, women and, in this latter category, between married and non-married women. The analysis shows an unusual increase in the activity rate in Canada between 1972 and 1978 that raised the male unemployment rate by about 2 percentage points and the aggregate unemployment rate by about 3 percentage points. This result is compatible with the expected consequences of the 1971 reform of the unemployment insurance program. Also, the analysis confirms that the unemployment gap has widened more for married women. However, their activity rate has risen faster in Canada until the middle of the eighties. This last fact makes difficult to ascribe sole responsibility for the unemployment gap of this group to the unemployment insurance program. Cette étude tente d’identifier ce qui cause l’écart persistant entre les taux de chômage canadien et américain et les raisons pour lesquelles cet écart s’est accru davantage pour les femmes que pour les hommes. Une méthode graphique est proposée, méthode qui permet de décomposer les variations de l’écart de taux de chômage provenant de chocs sur l’emploi et celles résultant de chocs du taux d’activité. On décompose également le marché du travail selon des catégories de travailleurs et travailleuses ayant des degrés différents d’attachement au marché du travail, soit les hommes et les femmes et, dans ce dernier groupe, entre les femmes non mariées d’une part et les femmes mariées d’autre part. L’analyse fait ressortir une hausse inhabituellement rapide des taux d’activité au Canada entre 1972 et 1978 qui a fait augmenter le taux de chômage des hommes d’environ 2 points de pourcentage et le taux de chômage agrégé d’environ 3 points de pourcentage. Ce résultat est conforme aux conséquences prévisibles de la réforme de 1971 de l’assurance-chômage. Par ailleurs, l’analyse confirme que l’écart de taux de chômage entre les deux pays est plus grand pour les femmes mariées. Cependant, leur taux d’activité a progressé plus rapidement au Canada jusqu’au milieu des années 80. Ce dernier fait rend peu probable la responsabilité unique de l’assurance-chômage dans l’écart de chômage de ce groupe.
Suggested Citation
Fortin, Mario, 1994.
"L’écart de chômage entre le Canada et les États-Unis : analyse des divergences entre les hommes et les femmes,"
L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 70(3), pages 247-270, septembre.
Handle:
RePEc:ris:actuec:v:70:y:1994:i:3:p:247-270
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- David Gray & Gilles Grenier, 1998.
"Jobless Durations of Displaced Workers: A Comparison of Canada and the United States,"
Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 24(s1), pages 152-169, February.
- Heisz, Andrew & Baker, Michael & Corak, Miles, 1996.
"Unemployment in the Stock and Flow,"
Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series
1997097e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:70:y:1994:i:3:p:247-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Dostie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scseeea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.