IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/actuec/v67y1991i1p80-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les familles sans enfant ou avec enfants : aisance ou pauvreté? Les faits au Canada et au Québec de 1971 à 1987

Author

Listed:
  • Brouillette, Liliane

    (Département des sciences économiques, Université du Québec à Montréal)

  • Felteau, Claude

    (Département des sciences économiques, Université du Québec à Montréal)

  • Lefebvre, Pierre

    (Département des sciences économiques, Université du Québec à Montréal)

  • Pelletier, Alain

    (Département des sciences économiques, Université du Québec à Montréal)

Abstract

This study compares the economic well-being of families with and without children and looks into their place in the size distribution of income, in Canada and Québec from 1971 to 1987. The evidence presented in the paper suggests that having children reduces the chances of affluence and increases the risk of poverty. Viewed from the perspective of the low levels of fertility in Canada and in Québec, the evidence casts some doubts on the consistency of recent changes, by the two levels of government, in the fiscal and transfer policies concerning families with children. Le but de cet article est d’analyser le statut économique relatif des couples avec enfants et sans enfant sur la période 1971-1987 au Canada et au Québec. On montre que la présence d’enfants dans les familles entraîne un coût d’opportunité en termes de niveau de vie qui réduit substantiellement la possibilité de vivre selon des standards élevés d’aisance matérielle et accroît le risque de pauvreté. Ceci soulève la question de la cohérence des modifications récentes, divergentes selon les paliers de gouvernement, des régimes de la fiscalité directe et des transferts à l’égard des familles avec enfants, dans le contexte actuel des faibles niveaux de fécondité au Canada et au Québec.

Suggested Citation

  • Brouillette, Liliane & Felteau, Claude & Lefebvre, Pierre & Pelletier, Alain, 1991. "Les familles sans enfant ou avec enfants : aisance ou pauvreté? Les faits au Canada et au Québec de 1971 à 1987," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 67(1), pages 80-102, mars.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:67:y:1991:i:1:p:80-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/602027ar
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Wade, 1988. "Review," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 99-100, July.
    2. Becker, Gary S, 1988. "Family Economics and Macro Behavior," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(1), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Nerlove, Marc & Razin, Assaf & Sadka, Efraim, 1987. "Household and Economy," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780125157520 edited by Shell, Karl.
    4. Pollak, Robert A & Wales, Terence J, 1979. "Welfare Comparisons and Equivalence Scales," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(2), pages 216-221, May.
    5. repec:bla:revinw:v:34:y:1988:i:3:p:275-88 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Lazear, Edward P & Michael, Robert T, 1980. "Family Size and the Distribution of Real Per Capita Income," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(1), pages 91-107, March.
    7. Hans Messinger & Frank Fedyk & Allen Zeesman, 1988. "The Size And Distribution Of The Poverty Gap In Canada: A Micro Analysis Of Variations Among Demographic Groups," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 34(3), pages 275-288, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:eee:labchp:v:1:y:1986:i:c:p:273-304 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. van Praag, B. M. S., 1984. "Household Cost Functions And Equivalence Scales An Alternative Approach," Econometric Institute Archives 272287, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Jesus Fernández-Villaverde & Dirk Krueger, 2007. "Consumption over the Life Cycle: Facts from Consumer Expenditure Survey Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 89(3), pages 552-565, August.
    4. Ehrlich, Isaac & Kim, Jinyoung, 2005. "Endogenous fertility, mortality and economic growth: Can a Malthusian framework account for the conflicting historical trends in population?," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 789-806, October.
    5. Nancy Folbre & Marta Murray-Close & Jooyeoun Suh, 2018. "Equivalence scales for extended income in the U.S," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 189-227, June.
    6. Weizsäcker, Robert K. von, 1995. "Does an Aging Population Increase Inequality?," Discussion Papers 535, Institut fuer Volkswirtschaftslehre und Statistik, Abteilung fuer Volkswirtschaftslehre.
    7. von Weizsacker, Robert K., 1996. "Distributive implications of an aging society," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-5), pages 729-746, April.
    8. Ehrlich, Isaac & Lui, Francis, 1997. "The problem of population and growth: A review of the literature from Malthus to contemporary models of endogenous population and endogenous growth," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 205-242, January.
    9. Yuxiang Ye & Steven F. Koch & Jiangfeng Zhang, 2020. "Modelling Required Energy Consumption with Equivalence Scales," Working Papers 202014, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    10. Ursicino Carrascal Arranz, 1996. "Estimación de escalas de equivalencia de consumo mediante un modelo de demenda casi ideal (AIDS) ampliado," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 6, pages 25-38, Diciembre.
    11. Esa Mangeloja, 2004. "Interrelationship of economic growth and regional religious properties," ERSA conference papers ersa04p94, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    13. Thomas F. Crossley & Hamish W. Low, 2011. "Is The Elasticity Of Intertemporal Substitution Constant?," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 9(1), pages 87-105, February.
    14. Ireland, Peter N., 2003. "Endogenous money or sticky prices?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(8), pages 1623-1648, November.
    15. Giuseppe Croce & Emanuela Ghignoni, 2011. "Overeducation and spatial flexibility in Italian local labour markets," Working Papers in Public Economics 145, University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Economics and Law.
    16. Carranza, Luis J. & Cayo, Juan M. & Galdon-Sanchez, Jose E., 2003. "Exchange rate volatility and economic performance in Peru: a firm level analysis," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 472-496, December.
    17. David M. Brasington & Diane Hite, 2005. "Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Approach," Departmental Working Papers 2005-08, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    18. Juan Carlos Conesa & Timothy J. Kehoe & Kim J. Ruhl, 2007. "Modeling great depressions: the depression in Finland in the 1990s," Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, vol. 31(Nov), pages 16-44.
    19. Jonas Agell & Helge Bennmarker, 2003. "Endogenous Wage Rigidity," CESifo Working Paper Series 1081, CESifo.
    20. Élodie Bertrand, 2006. "La thèse d'efficience du « théorème de Coase ». Quelle critique de la microéconomie ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(5), pages 983-1007.
    21. James Smith, 1989. "Children Among the Poor," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 26(2), pages 235-248, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:67:y:1991:i:1:p:80-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Dostie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scseeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.