IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rge/journl/v11y2023i2p75-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovacion abierta en Cuba: Experiencia del Programa de Innovacion Agropecuaria Local (PIAL)(Open innovation in Cuba: Experience of the Local Agricultural Innovation Program (PIAL) )

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Luisa Zamora Rodriguez

    (Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologia y Medio Ambiente)

  • Nathalie Daniela Avila Hierrezuelo

    (Mipyme Countigo S.R.L)

  • Rosa Acosta Roca

    (Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agricolas. Ministerio de Educacion Superior)

Abstract

Con el objetivo de contribuir al fortalecimiento del sistema de innovacion local (SIL), en municipios cubanos, se realiza un analisis de las potencialidades del Sistema de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion (CTI) cubano y los resultados del Programa de Innovacion Agricola Local (PIAL), como experiencia exitosa de innovacion abierta, a partir de la Gestion del Conocimiento y la Innovacion. Metodos: Investigacion-accion, revision documental, y opinion de expertos. Resultados: El contexto cubano actual con las nuevas politicas fortalece el Sistema de CTI. El espacio por excelencia para fomentar un SIL fuerte es el municipio, como punto de partida para buscar soluciones a problemas locales especificos. Los gobiernos y administraciones locales deben lograr la conectividad entre generadores de conocimientos, resultados y tecnologias y sus apropiadores, e implementar el marco regulatorio y financiero que favorezca el desarrollo cientifico, tecnologico y la innovacion. PIAL ha demostrado ser una herramienta efectiva para promover innovacion abierta, con alcance en mas de 753 550 personas (35% mujeres) de 75 municipios de 12 provincias del pais. El Sistema de Gestion de Gobierno basado en ciencia e innovacion (SGGCI), es un instrumento que fortalece y consolida experiencias de innovacion abierta en la produccion de alimentos y los sistemas de innovacion a todos los niveles, conectando ciencia con economia, en pos del desarrollo economico social del pais.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Luisa Zamora Rodriguez & Nathalie Daniela Avila Hierrezuelo & Rosa Acosta Roca, 2023. "Innovacion abierta en Cuba: Experiencia del Programa de Innovacion Agropecuaria Local (PIAL)(Open innovation in Cuba: Experience of the Local Agricultural Innovation Program (PIAL) )," Revista Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología (GECONTEC), Revista Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología (GECONTEC), vol. 11(2), pages 75-89, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rge:journl:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:75-89
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10431436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10431436
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.10431436?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cécile Ayerbe & Sandra Dubouloz & Sophie Mignon & Marc Robert, 2020. "Management Innovation and Open Innovation: For and Towards Dialogue," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 13-41.
    2. Daniel Bageac & Emmanuelle Reynaud & Sergio Fortun & Ngọc Thuy Vo Thi, 2020. "Organizational aspects of open innovation," Post-Print hal-02945646, HAL.
    3. Borrás, Susana & Edquist, Charles, 2013. "The choice of innovation policy instruments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(8), pages 1513-1522.
    4. Sophie Mignon & Cécile Ayerbe & Sandra Dubouloz & Marc Robert & Joel West, 2020. "Managerial Innovation and Management of Open Innovation," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 3-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soufiane Kherrazi & Karim Saïd, 2022. "Managerial Practices Within Multilateral And Public-Funded R&D Collaborations," Post-Print hal-04205187, HAL.
    2. Ingrid Fasshauer, 2020. "Open Innovation Business Models : the example of living labs in France," Post-Print hal-03312263, HAL.
    3. Liotard, Isabelle & Revest, Valérie, 2018. "Contests as innovation policy instruments: Lessons from the US federal agencies' experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 57-69.
    4. Reichardt, Kristin & Rogge, Karoline S. & Negro, Simona, 2015. "Unpacking the policy processes for addressing systemic problems: The case of the technological innovation system of offshore wind in Germany," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S2/2015, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    5. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    6. Caloffi, Annalisa & Freo, Marzia & Ghinoi, Stefano & Mariani, Marco & Rossi, Federica, 2022. "Assessing the effects of a deliberate policy mix: The case of technology and innovation advisory services and innovation vouchers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    7. Giliberto Capano & Andrea Lippi, 2017. "How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers’ choices," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(2), pages 269-293, June.
    8. Dziallas, Marisa & Blind, Knut, 2019. "Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 3-29.
    9. Hans Pohl, 2021. "Internationalisation, innovation, and academic–corporate co-publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1329-1358, February.
    10. Xu, Lei & Su, Jun, 2016. "From government to market and from producer to consumer: Transition of policy mix towards clean mobility in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 328-340.
    11. Hellsmark, Hans & Frishammar, Johan & Söderholm, Patrik & Ylinenpää, Håkan, 2016. "The role of pilot and demonstration plants in technology development and innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1743-1761.
    12. Bernd Ebersberger & Nils Mevenkamp, 2016. "Open Innovation in Eastern Europe and Central Asia," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 8-19, October.
    13. Emmanuel Muller & Andrea Zenker & Miriam Hufnagl & Jean-Alain Héraud & Esther Schnabl & Teemu Makkonen & Henning Kroll, 2017. "Smart specialisation strategies and cross-border integration of regional innovation systems: Policy dynamics and challenges for the Upper Rhine," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(4), pages 684-702, June.
    14. Alessandra Colombelli & Francesco Quatraro, 2013. "New Firm Formation and the properties of local knowledge bases: Evidence from Italian NUTS 3 regions," Working Papers hal-00858989, HAL.
    15. Jose Guimon, 2014. "Regional Inovation Policy and Multilevel Governance in Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Reports 23655, The World Bank Group.
    16. Hilde Nykamp, 2020. "Policy Mix for a Transition to Sustainability: Green Buildings in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Elias G. Carayannis & Luca Dezi & Gianluca Gregori & Ernesto Calo, 2022. "Smart Environments and Techno-centric and Human-Centric Innovations for Industry and Society 5.0: A Quintuple Helix Innovation System View Towards Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive Solutions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 926-955, June.
    18. Kajikawa, Yuya & Mejia, Cristian & Wu, Mengjia & Zhang, Yi, 2022. "Academic landscape of Technological Forecasting and Social Change through citation network and topic analyses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    19. Huiqin Zhang & Ting Deng & Meng Wang & Xudong Chen, 2019. "Content Analysis of Talent Policy on Promoting Sustainable Development of Talent: Taking Sichuan Province as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Bento, Nuno & Sousa, Cristina & Trindade, Paula & Mamede, Ricardo Paes & Fontes, Margarida & Alves, Tiago, 2022. "Robust relation between public procurement for innovation and economic development," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Open innovation; innovation system; innovation policy; local innovation system; local agricultural innovation; innovacion abierta; sistema de innovacion; politica de innovacion; innovacion agropecuaria local;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rge:journl:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:75-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Luis Camilo Ortigueira Sánchez (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.gecontec.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.