Author
Listed:
- Syed Wasi Haider
(Department of Information Technology , Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan)
- Hamza Shabbir
(Department of Software Engineering, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan)
- Muhammad Waseem Iqbal
(Associate Professor, Department of Information Technology, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan)
- Saleem Zubair Ahmad
(Professor, Department of Information Technology , Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan)
- Sabah Arif
(Department of Software Engineering, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan)
Abstract
The Ease of Use Test (UT) method is used to evaluate a website's or its point of interaction's usability without involving the site's actual users. UT can be carried out manually or with the use of a machine. Currently, a lot of software testers manually test their program, which leads to issues like lengthier test times, uneven testing, and the requirement for human intervention to complete every test. The ease of use test manual is an expensive and time-consuming process. Analyzers are additional resources needed for manual labor, and there is a great chance that these results will conflict. The goal of this investigation is to improve the reliability and skill of the Test Case (TC) age experiments; the test system is delivered using test instruments that have been programmed. The purpose of this examination's efficient writing audit was to identify any gaps in the current AT and create a mess in the TC era. The evaluation was also focused on identifying the primary issues raised by alternate neighborhood analysts throughout the physical creation of TC. According to the selected plausible experiments, TC was created using the fluffy rationale master structure. Non-probabilistic, vulnerability-related, and multi-esteemed reasoning can all be emphasized in fluffy reasoning. The purpose of the information inquiry was to obtain access to the login page and to create experiments about Graphic User Interface events using a lighthearted justification. The framework separated the conditions, traits, and watchwords from the information examination code, and the outcomes were displayed as experiments. A close examination of behavioral test system age processes was conducted using the master framework for evaluation based on fluff. The evaluation results obtained through quantifiable analysis demonstrated that the provided framework is significantly more productive and reliable for conducting experiments than the manual framework.
Suggested Citation
Syed Wasi Haider & Hamza Shabbir & Muhammad Waseem Iqbal & Saleem Zubair Ahmad & Sabah Arif, 2024.
"Fuzzy Based Expert System For Test Case Generation On Web Graphical User Interface For Usability Test Improvement,"
Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 990-998.
Handle:
RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:990-998
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:990-998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffhlpk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.