IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfh/bbejor/v13y2024i2p763-766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between Caregiver Burden and Psychological Well-being among the Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Mediating Role of Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Sehrish Irshad

    (PhD Scholar, Department of Applied Psychology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan)

  • Dr. Iram Batool

    (Associate Professor, Department of Applied Psychology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan)

  • Habiba Nazim

    (PhD Scholar, Department of Applied Psychology, Bahauddin Zakarya University, Multan, Pakistan)

Abstract

The current study was conducted to investigate the mediating effect in the relationship of caregivers’ burden and psychological well-being among the caregivers of cancer patients. Correlational research was used. Survey was designed as a method of data collection accompanied with questionnaire. Purposive sampling technique was employed to select the sample of the study (n=311, Male=150, Female=160). The Zarit 4-itenm Burden Interview, Rapid Caregiver Well-being Scale (R-CWBS), and Brief Reliance Scale were used as research instrument to measure the study variables. Findings of the study reveal that there is no significant relationship between caregivers’ burden and their psychological well-being. In addition, resilience is positively correlated with caregivers’ burden. Moreover, the results depict that there is no mediation effect of resilience on the relationship of caregivers’ burden and caregivers’ psychological well-being. Furthermore, female caregivers reported the greater level of caregiver burden as compared to male. There is no statistically mean score difference on psychological well-being with respect to gender. Male caregivers were found with higher level of resilience than female. The mean scores differences on caregivers’ burden, caregivers’ psychological well-being and their level of resilience were found statistically significant with respect to participants’ marital status and job status. It is suggested that caregivers of cancer patients must improve their coping strategies.The current study was conducted to investigate the mediating effect in the relationship of caregivers’ burden and psychological well-being among the caregivers of cancer patients. Correlational research was used. Survey was designed as a method of data collection accompanied with questionnaire. Purposive sampling technique was employed to select the sample of the study (n=311, Male=150, Female=160). The Zarit 4-itenm Burden Interview, Rapid Caregiver Well-being Scale (R-CWBS), and Brief Reliance Scale were used as research instrument to measure the study variables. Findings of the study reveal that there is no significant relationship between caregivers’ burden and their psychological well-being. In addition, resilience is positively correlated with caregivers’ burden. Moreover, the results depict that there is no mediation effect of resilience on the relationship of caregivers’ burden and caregivers’ psychological well-being. Furthermore, female caregivers reported the greater level of caregiver burden as compared to male. There is no statistically mean score difference on psychological well-being with respect to gender. Male caregivers were found with higher level of resilience than female. The mean scores differences on caregivers’ burden, caregivers’ psychological well-being and their level of resilience were found statistically significant with respect to participants’ marital status and job status. It is suggested that caregivers of cancer patients must improve their coping strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sehrish Irshad & Dr. Iram Batool & Habiba Nazim, 2024. "Relationship between Caregiver Burden and Psychological Well-being among the Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Mediating Role of Resilience," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 763-766.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:763-766
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/BBE/article/view/903/943
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/BBE/article/view/903
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00391?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:763-766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffhlpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.