Author
Listed:
- Zulfiqar Ali Ayaz
(Department of Information Technology, Superior University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan)
- Hafiz Shoaib Ur Rehman
(Department of Information Technology, Superior University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan)
- Nouman Arshid
(Department of Information Technology, Superior University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan)
- Riasat Ali
(Department of Information Technology, Superior University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan)
- Muhammad Waseem Iqbal
(Department of Information Technology, Superior University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan)
- Misbah Noor
(Department of Information Technology, Superior University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan)
- Saleem Zubair Ahmad
(Department of Information Technology, Superior University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan)
Abstract
The ease of use test (UT) process is used to evaluate the usability of a website or its point of contact without involving actual site visitors. UT can be done manually or with the use of mechanized equipment. The manual course of ease of use test is time-consuming and expensive. Manual labor needs additional resources (analyzers) and exceptional possibilities to counteract those consequences. The goal of this investigation is to improve the competency and reliability of experiments' (TC) age through; the test system is communicated using programmed test instruments. Robotized testing (RT) may be effective and precise. There are several robotized devices available for programming testing, with limited access to TC computerization. The efficient writing audit (SLR) was directed in this examination to sort out the gap(s) in current AT and huddle in TC age. Furthermore the review was aimed at identifying the primary problems examined by various neighborhood analyzers during the process of physically generating TC. Fluffy reasoning master structure was used to generate TC based on the selected reasonable experiments. The fluffy rationale can emphasize non-probabilistic concerns vulnerability and multi-esteemed rationale. The information investigation was carried out to get access to the login page and trials were carried out provided the GRAPHIC USER INTERFACE instances using flowery reasoning. The framework extracted the watchwords attributes and conditions from the information examination code and displayed the results as experiments. A close examination was conducted among behavioral test system age processes using the fluffy-based master framework for evaluation. The assessment findings obtained through quantifiable examination show that the proposed framework is more productive and trustworthy for creating experiments than the manual framework.
Suggested Citation
Zulfiqar Ali Ayaz & Hafiz Shoaib Ur Rehman & Nouman Arshid & Riasat Ali & Muhammad Waseem Iqbal & Misbah Noor & Saleem Zubair Ahmad, 2024.
"Expert System for Web Graphical User Interface Test Case Generation for Usability Test,"
Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 456-464.
Handle:
RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:456-464
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00228
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:456-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffhlpk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.