Author
Listed:
- Nasir Majeed
(Assistant Professor, School of Law, University of Gujrat, Pakistan)
- Amjad Hilal
(Assistant Professor, Department of Law and Shariah, University of Swat, Pakistan)
- Arshad Nawaz Khan
(Assistant Professor, School of Law, Quaid-e Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan)
Abstract
The doctrinal legal research has been the dominant and most influential research methods in law. The purpose of the present study was twofold; to explore the scope and to analyze the methodologies of doctrinal legal research. After analyzing the systematically selected literature, the present study found that doctrinal research is concerned with methodically finding examining explaining and justifying the enacted legal framework. In addition the doctrinal research was also used to predict the future development in law. Moreover the study found that doctrinal research methodology was used by legal and non-legal researchers. The study also found that the beginning of the doctrinal legal research is the presence of a legal problem which is followed by finding the relevant legal material including statutory law constitutional provision pertaining to the problem by laws judicial decisions commentaries of the analysts encyclopedias and dictionaries. The study further found that after finding the relevant legal material, a researcher is required to analyze the legal material to determine the fitness of the problem or to suggest the solution of legal problem. Further to that, a researcher should also synthesize the legal material to highlight the inconsistencies between enacted legislation and fundamentals legal norms and principles of the legal system. The study also found that a doctrinal research study is concluded by reporting the findings and the recommendations.
Suggested Citation
Nasir Majeed & Amjad Hilal & Arshad Nawaz Khan, 2023.
"Doctrinal Research in Law: Meaning, Scope and Methodology,"
Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(4), pages 559-563.
Handle:
RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:559-563
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00167
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:559-563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffhlpk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.