IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfh/bbejor/v12y2023i3p692-698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electoral Politics during 1951 Provincial Elections in the Punjab: A Progression of Authoritarian Legacy

Author

Listed:
  • Nusrat Asif

    (Associate Professor, Government Graduate Fatima Jinnah College for Women, Chuna Mandi, Lahore, Pakistan)

Abstract

This research paper explored electoral patterns in the Punjab after independence focusing on the first provincial elections of Punjab. Did the voters have any real choice? How was the religion card employed in the absence of non-Muslims? And how important were ethnic and geographical affiliations in a newly independent, conventional Punjab. How fluidity of displaced people affected the electoral behaviour and results. These important inquiries have important implications for the present scenario. Muslim League became a major political party and incumbent government during the early years of independence. The provincial election helped its splinter groups into new political parties. Victimhood, blaming, national unity, and the Kashmir issue were top trends in campaign rhetoric. Rural election campaigns focused on biradri, clan or village heads. Both male and female voter registration and vote casting still needed to improve. Muslim League was accused of using officials and rigging. Research noticed that the electoral reforms improved the election process while acceptance of election results could not make its place. Press lacked objectivity and the government imposed censorship on its critics. The Punjabi electors voted Muslim League as well as opposition with conventional thinking rejecting radical call against Muslim League, popular at that time in East Bengal. This article contributes to understanding early electoral behaviour of Punjab, particularly and the present scenario of elections in both Punjab and Pakistan in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Nusrat Asif, 2023. "Electoral Politics during 1951 Provincial Elections in the Punjab: A Progression of Authoritarian Legacy," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(3), pages 692-698.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:692-698
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/BBE/article/view/591/474
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/BBE/article/view/591
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:692-698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffhlpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.