IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfb/journl/v16y2024i1p73-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolving Efficiency of Cryptocurrency Market: Evidence from Leading Cryptocurrencies

Author

Listed:
  • Mallesha L
  • Archana H. N.

Abstract

The article investigated the efficiency of the cryptocurrency market, with a focus on Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Tether (USDT), and Binance Coin (BNB-USD), based on their substantial market capitalization. For this purpose, we observed the daily closing prices spanning from January 2018 to December 2023 and employed a set of robust tests, including the generalized spectral test, automatic portmanteau test, and automatic variance ratio test. The findings of the study reveal a random pattern in price fluctuations, indicating weak form efficiency. Furthermore, we adopted the rolling window approach to investigate whether market efficiency is dynamic or static over time. The empirical result illustrated that the crypto market efficiency remains static over time, except for USDT. In conclusion, the overall empirical results support the notion of the random walk hypothesis, indicating that past price movements offer no predictive insight into future prices. These findings have significant implications for investors, emphasizing the lack of predictive insight from past price movements. Policymakers are urged to establish a robust framework for market integrity and reliable price discovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Mallesha L & Archana H. N., 2024. "Evolving Efficiency of Cryptocurrency Market: Evidence from Leading Cryptocurrencies," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 16(1), pages 73-84, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfb:journl:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:73-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rfb.ase.ro/articole/RFB_2024V1_art_6-2.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfb:journl:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:73-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tatu Lucian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.