IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v13y2025i1p119-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Usefulness as a Mediating Variable on the Relationship Between Video Quality and Audience Emotional Engagement in Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Tinglei Liu
  • Feroz De Costa
  • Megat Al Imran Yasing

Abstract

Facing dual challenges of inadequate dissemination and limited acceptance, this study scrutinizes why social media struggles to promote traditional culture effectively. It identifies low-quality videos on social platforms, particularly short-form content, as the main hurdle, leading to reduced impact. Investigating the relationship between short-form video quality and audience receptivity, this study categorizes quality into media richness, impact, and interactivity dimensions. Findings confirm that higher-quality videos correlate with increased emotional engagement. Employing the Technology Acceptance Theory (TAM), perceived usefulness partially mediates the link between video quality and emotional engagement. Elevating video quality not only enhances perceived usefulness but also deepens emotional resonance, ultimately amplifying cultural impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Tinglei Liu & Feroz De Costa & Megat Al Imran Yasing, 2025. "Perceived Usefulness as a Mediating Variable on the Relationship Between Video Quality and Audience Emotional Engagement in Social Media," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 13(1), pages 119-134, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:119-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/7234/6738
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/7234
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:119-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.