IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v12y2024i4p297-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Privacy Study on How Social Media Users Create Paradoxical Collective Behavioral Portraits

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Lyu
  • Lily Suriani Binti Mohd Arif

Abstract

This study investigates the group characteristics of WeChat users’ paradoxical privacy behaviors by constructing user portraits to fully understand the differences between user group characteristics and paradoxical privacy behaviors on social media platforms, and to provide users with personalized privacy protection and targeted services, strategy and specific instructions. This study takes WeChat users as the research object and uses the Vals2 attitude scale as a reference to construct a group image annotation system for WeChat users' paradoxical privacy behavior from the perspective of psychological preferences. By issuing questionnaires, the paradoxical privacy behavior of WeChat users was analyzed using methods such as factor analysis, cluster analysis, and discriminant analysis. Clustering users' paradoxical behaviors in privacy to obtain data and characterize different user groups. Research results show that the group image of WeChat users’ paradoxical privacy behavior can be divided into three types- experience-oriented, mature and rational, and egocentric. This study proposes an ambivalent group behavior model of social media user privacy. In the future, we will modify the group portrait model and consider using it in other scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Lyu & Lily Suriani Binti Mohd Arif, 2024. "A Privacy Study on How Social Media Users Create Paradoxical Collective Behavioral Portraits," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 12(4), pages 297-310, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:12:y:2024:i:4:p:297-310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/6904/6713
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/6904
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:12:y:2024:i:4:p:297-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.