IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v12y2024i3p231-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Quality of Online Information About Perinatal Depression in China

Author

Listed:
  • Miaomiao Li
  • Wan Anita Wan Abas
  • Aini Azeqa Ma’rof
  • Peng Wang
  • Xiaoyan Wang

Abstract

This study assessed the quality of Chinese-language websites that provide information about perinatal depression, focusing on their compliance with recognized quality standards, the impact of information content providers on information quality, and the correlation between search engine ranking and quality. We conducted a systematic search on the Baidu search engine and screened 55 relevant websites. The quality of these websites was assessed using the DISCERN instruments. Our findings suggest that the quality of information on websites about perinatal depression is predominantly 'poor', with commercial sites constituting the entirety of the sample, although health information content provided by non-profit organizations demonstrating significantly higher quality. There was a significant negative correlation between search engine rankings and the quality of information on perinatal depression, suggesting that higher quality content is less likely to be searched for and may hinder access to reliable information. This study highlights the urgent need for mechanisms to prioritize the display of high-quality information in search engine results to provide better assistance to Chinese patients with perinatal depression.

Suggested Citation

  • Miaomiao Li & Wan Anita Wan Abas & Aini Azeqa Ma’rof & Peng Wang & Xiaoyan Wang, 2024. "Evaluation of the Quality of Online Information About Perinatal Depression in China," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 12(3), pages 231-239, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:231-239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/6908/6610
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/6908
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:231-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.