IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v12y2024i3p168-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Assessment of Review Clips by Disabled Students for a Teenage Soul Healing Program on the TikTok Platform

Author

Listed:
  • Kuntida Thamwipat
  • Pornpapatsorn Princhankol
  • Sorakrich Maneewan
  • Mookrawee Pintong
  • Thanachote Eaksombun

Abstract

The purposes of this research were 1) to develop review clips by disabled students for a teenage soul healing program on the TikTok platform 2) to evaluate the quality of the review clips by disabled students 3) to evaluate the perception of the samples 4) to evaluate the satisfaction of the samples. The research tools included 1) the review clips by disabled students for the teenage soul healing program on the TikTok platform 2) the quality assessment form 3) the perception assessment form 4) the satisfaction assessment form. Data were collected from a sample group comprising 60 students chosen by a simple random sampling method from the Department of Educational Communications and Technology in the second semester of the 2023 academic who were exposed the review clips and who were willing to complete the questionnaire. The results were 4 review clips by disabled students using ADDIE Model. The evaluation by experts identified that content and media presentation quality assessment was at a very good level , while the samples’ perception and satisfaction were at the highest level.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuntida Thamwipat & Pornpapatsorn Princhankol & Sorakrich Maneewan & Mookrawee Pintong & Thanachote Eaksombun, 2024. "Development and Assessment of Review Clips by Disabled Students for a Teenage Soul Healing Program on the TikTok Platform," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 12(3), pages 168-176, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:168-176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/6896/6599
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/6896
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:168-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.