IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v5y2017i10p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freeing Leonardo da Vinci’s Fight for the Standard in the Hall of the Five Hundred at Florence’s Palazzo Vecchio

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Cassella

Abstract

In June 2017, the author wrote an article in the International Journal of Social Science Studies in which he hypothesized that the Hall of the Five Hundred at Florence’s Palazzo Vecchio has been protecting the central piece of Leonardo da Vinci’s mural Battle of Anghiari: The Fight for the Standard (La lotta per lo stendardo) under Giorgio Vasari’s painting Battle of Marciano for 512 years now. On the evening of August 10, 2017, the author read a veiled message left by Vasari: The vertical line that passes through the center of the Battle of Marciano also passes through the center of the Fight for the Standard. On the evening of August 15, the author read a second secret message left by Vasari: The bottom of Leonardo’s Battle of Anghiari aligns with the floor of the Hall of the Five Hundred. Beyond previous hypotheses, the author envisions here that, after drilling a 1/2-inch hole at 0.915 meters from the floor, on the vertical line that leaves the virtual larynx of the screaming supine soldier in the Battle of Marciano, a laparoscope will point at the virtual larynx of the yelling prostrate soldier in the Fight for the Standard. Our wild assault against the wild and against humanistic intelligence is unsustainable. From a humanistic standpoint, the quantum-computing search to see again the classical-computing conflict attached to the Fight for the Standard will lead to a global Renaissance: The union of ancient knowledge about social values with modern scientific and technological skills will dispel global warming and fundamentalist-driven terrorism, while freeing our descendants to explore the cosmos in the next 7000 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Cassella, 2017. "Freeing Leonardo da Vinci’s Fight for the Standard in the Hall of the Five Hundred at Florence’s Palazzo Vecchio," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:5:y:2017:i:10:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/2657/2823
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/2657
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Cassella, 2018. "Exploring the Social Link between Cerebral and Cerebellar Neural Ensembles through a Falsifiable Psychological Heuristics," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(2), pages 69-93, February.
    2. Antonio Cassella, 2019. "Gaging the Neural Path of the Universal Grammar by the Logos Heuristics," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(6), pages 85-108, November.
    3. Antonio Cassella, 2019. "Joining General Relativity to Particles Physics through Complex Numbers and Autism," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(4), pages 33-56, July.
    4. Antonio Cassella, 2018. "Exploring the Sphinx and the Great Pyramid Through the Logos Heuristics," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(9), pages 10-30, August.
    5. Antonio Cassella Tummnino, 2023. "A Cognitive View of Martin Luther," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 11(2), pages 3053-3053, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    classical computing; quantum computing; social values; Humanism; Renaissance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:5:y:2017:i:10:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.