IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v12y2024i6p42-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Validity of Generalized Modal Syllogisms with the Quantifiers in Square {most} and Square{no}

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Xu
  • Yuzhen Wang

Abstract

On the basis of the valid generalized modal syllogism £EM¯O-2 containing the quantifiers in Square{most} and Square{no}, this paper explores the validity of the other generalized modal syllogisms. The reasons of the reducibility between/among valid generalized modal syllogisms are- that there are transformational relationships between/among Aristotelian quantifiers in Square{no} or generalized ones in Square{most}, and that the necessary modality and the possible one are dual, and that the quantifiers some and no are symmetric. This method is universal, and helps to study the validity of other kinds of syllogisms. It is hoped that the above results can promote the development of related fields such as computational linguistics.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Xu & Yuzhen Wang, 2024. "The Validity of Generalized Modal Syllogisms with the Quantifiers in Square {most} and Square{no}," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 12(6), pages 42-47, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:12:y:2024:i:6:p:42-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/download/7263/6731
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/7263
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:12:y:2024:i:6:p:42-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.