IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/jetsjl/v13y2025i1p71-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Fiction-Nonfiction Divide: Can Teachers’ Personal Reading Preferences Impact the Diversity of Genres Shared in Elementary Classrooms?

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon L. Russell

Abstract

Despite expanded efforts to increase the amount of nonfiction literature taught in elementary classrooms and a recent publication boom in the quantity and quality nonfiction children’s literature, a disparity still remains. While elementary teachers recognize the need to include more nonfiction, the primary genre for reading and literacy instruction remains fiction literature. Some of this may be about lack of acceptable children’s literature selections in the curriculum, but it may also indicate teachers’ preference for fiction. Using discourse analysis, this qualitative study analyzed the online discussion board responses of 99 graduate student in-service teachers who were asked about their early literacy experiences. Results indicated overwhelmingly positive early childhood memories of fiction (n=77), including many activities culturally situated within home and family, such as story time and library visits. Teachers did not recall similar early memories of nonfiction. Responses to nonfiction were more closely tied to schooling activities such as report writing and research. Some teachers also indicated a conscious effort to provide students with more exposure to nonfiction genres in their own classrooms. This study highlights the importance of directly addressing teachers’ personal preferences in both teacher preparation and in-service professional development to help them move toward more balanced classroom literacy across diverse genres.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon L. Russell, 2025. "The Fiction-Nonfiction Divide: Can Teachers’ Personal Reading Preferences Impact the Diversity of Genres Shared in Elementary Classrooms?," Journal of Education and Training Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 13(1), pages 71-85, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:jetsjl:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:71-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/jets/article/download/7427/6750
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/jets/article/view/7427
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:jetsjl:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:71-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.