IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/bmsjnl/v2y2016i1p73-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discourse, Strategy, and Practice of Urban Resilience against Flooding

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Shou Su

Abstract

Resilience discourse is shifting the very meaning of ¡°resilience¡± from ¡°bouncing back¡± to ¡°bouncing forward¡± in the twenty-first century. International policies have provoked cities to play a proactive role in applying land-use and environmental planning strategies for disaster resilience. Strategies of urban flood resilience include prevention, accommodation, fortification, protection, retreat, and green infrastructure. In general, four models of resilience against flooding are primarily adopted: the structure model, the non-structure model, the land-use and environmental planning model, and the retreat planning model. Results indicate that planning more space for the river, wetland planning, polder and retention areas, and permeable surface design do matter in reducing flood risks. Additionally, urban growth management, directing developments and populations away from floodplains, could reduce flood risks and damages. Finally, in retreat model, urban resilience stresses retreat and evacuation to reduce flood damages. Retreat strategies and alternatives, such as property buyouts, relocations, new towns for accommodations, and land swaps for less risky areas, could be applied in helping to achieve urban flood resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Shou Su, 2016. "Discourse, Strategy, and Practice of Urban Resilience against Flooding," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 73-87, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:bmsjnl:v:2:y:2016:i:1:p:73-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/1348/1337
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/1348
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:bmsjnl:v:2:y:2016:i:1:p:73-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.