Author
Abstract
This study explores the role of mindset transformation in Ghana's development, arguing that shifting from an individualistic "I" mentality to a collective "We" mindset is key to overcoming governance inefficiencies. Despite its stable political environment and natural wealth, Ghana struggles with systemic issues such as corruption, weak institutions, and inefficiencies in public services. These challenges stem from societal attitudes that prioritize personal gain over collective well-being.To address this issue, the paper introduces the Collaborative Governance and Accountability Model (CGAM), a framework linking mindset transformation with governance effectiveness. It also presents the Governance Quality (GQ) Metric, which assesses governance performance through Engagement (E), Accountability (A), and Transparency (T). Unlike traditional governance models focused solely on institutional reforms, this study emphasizes the psychosocial and cultural dimensions of governance.Using a mixed-method approach, including qualitative surveys and in-depth interviews, the research demonstrates how fostering a collective mindset can reduce corruption, enhance institutional efficiency, and increase civic participation. The CGAM framework serves as both a theoretical foundation and a practical policy tool for governance improvements.The findings contribute to governance studies by establishing a direct link between mindset transformation and governance effectiveness. The study ensures consistency in the application of the GQ metric throughout the analysis, integrating it into all governance discussions and visual representations. While focused on Ghana, the CGAM model offers a replicable framework for nations facing similar governance challenges.
Suggested Citation
Isaac Yaw Asiedu, 2025.
"The Transformative Power of Mindset in Africa's Development: A Collaborative Governance Model for Ghana,"
Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 12(1), pages 45-61, February.
Handle:
RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:45-61
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:45-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.