IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/aefjnl/v11y2024i3p20-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the Discussion on the Effectiveness of Alternative Portfolio Models: Out-of-sample Analysis of Brazil’s Equity Market, 2015-23

Author

Listed:
  • Vitor M. A. da Fonseca
  • Manuel A. R. da Fonseca
  • Andre B. Oliveira

Abstract

Around the world, equity markets draw the attention of investors and financial researchers, who share a common interest in searching for relatively more efficient portfolio strategies. Although numerous new allocation techniques have been proposed, the available literature still give emphasis to more traditional analytical systems. Accordingly, in this research, a large sample, with many stocks and long data series, is applied to the comparative analysis of widely used portfolio models trough results based on out-of-sample data. We also carry out a statistical evaluation of the sample distributions of returns in order to assess if the available data are consistent with the commonly accepted hypothesis that the effects of estimation risk are present in solutions based on the mean-variance model. The results obtained, contrary to many critical evaluations, highlight the superiority of portfolios derived from optimal allocation models over strategies based on market index and equal weights.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitor M. A. da Fonseca & Manuel A. R. da Fonseca & Andre B. Oliveira, 2024. "Revisiting the Discussion on the Effectiveness of Alternative Portfolio Models: Out-of-sample Analysis of Brazil’s Equity Market, 2015-23," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 20-32, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:11:y:2024:i:3:p:20-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/aef/article/download/6999/6653
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/aef/article/view/6999
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:11:y:2024:i:3:p:20-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.