IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ren/journl/v12y2020i3p461-483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge and Export Modes: Which Export Strategy Boosts Firms Knowledge Acquisition?

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Di Cintio

    (Università del Salento)

Abstract

"The aim of our research is to investigate whether the choice to export directly versus indirect export plays a role in the level of knowledge acquired by exporting firms. To the best of our knowledge, there is no empirical evidence in this stream of literature and our original contribution consists in considering the outcomes of learning-by-exporting in presence of export intermediaries. Thus, we study whether different export strategies may generate different unobservable productivity premia. In particular, we focused on 25 emerging Countries, and through a machine learning method, we evaluate how the level of knowledge acquired by firms would change if those who chose a specific strategy had instead chosen another one. Our results show that (1) the learning by exporting hypothesis is still valid when firms export indirectly; (2) direct exporters acquire more knowledge than indirect exporters; (3) under the same export strategy, Chinese exporters (direct and indirect) outperform other Asian exporters."

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Di Cintio, 2020. "Knowledge and Export Modes: Which Export Strategy Boosts Firms Knowledge Acquisition?," Review of Economic Analysis, Digital Initiatives at the University of Waterloo Library, vol. 12(4), pages 461-483, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ren:journl:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:461-483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/rofea/article/view/1956/4576
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ren:journl:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:461-483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Jerzy (Jurek) Konieczny (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rcfea.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.