IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rej/journl/v24y2021i81p50-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Work Centrality and Type of Work on Life Satisfaction: an Exploration of Global Respondents

Author

Listed:
  • Vallari Chandna

Abstract

Organizations have over time, become concerned with non-work aspects of their employees’ lives such as their life satisfaction and their happiness. This is because extant research has shown these states of being, truly have an impact on their job performance, intra-organizational relationships, and other important work-related outcomes. The World Values Survey assesses the cultural values of people across the world, what is important to them in life, their physical and mental state of being, and other valuable information. Using a random portion of this international dataset and drawing on the literatures pertaining to work centrality and meaning of work, the hypothesized model is developed to test the relationship between work centrality and the flow at work (i.e., type of work done) on the life satisfaction of individuals. These aspects of the work domain were found to have a minimal direct impact on life satisfaction leading to the reaffirmation that the different domains (work, family, values) have unequal impacts on life satisfaction and within each domain, different components have differing levels of impact as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Vallari Chandna, 2021. "The Impact of Work Centrality and Type of Work on Life Satisfaction: an Exploration of Global Respondents," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 24(81), pages 50-58, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rej:journl:v:24:y:2021:i:81:p:50-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rejournal.eu/sites/rejournal.versatech.ro/files/articole/2021-09-30/3668/4vallarichandna.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Clercq & Steven A. Brieger & Christian Welzel, 2021. "Leveraging the macro-level environment to balance work and life: an analysis of female entrepreneurs’ job satisfaction," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1361-1384, April.
    2. Janet Near & Paula Rechner, 1993. "Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: An historical view of differences among West European countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 109-121, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoyu Yu & Xiaotong Meng & Laura Stanley & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2024. "Self-employment and life satisfaction: The contingent role of formal institutions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 135-163, June.
    2. Clara Viñas-Bardolet & Monica Guillen-Royo & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2020. "Job Characteristics and Life Satisfaction in the EU: a Domains-of-Life Approach," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(4), pages 1069-1098, September.
    3. Robert Cummins, 1998. "The Second Approximation to an International Standard for Life Satisfaction," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 307-334, March.
    4. Norifumi Kawai & Hataya Sibunruang & Tomoyo Kazumi, 2023. "Work-family conflict, entrepreneurial regret, and entrepreneurial outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 837-861, June.
    5. Neharika Vohra & John Adair, 2000. "Life Satisfaction of Indian Immigrants in Canada," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 12(2), pages 109-138, September.
    6. Al James, 2024. "Platform work‐lives in the gig economy: Recentering work–family research," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 513-534, March.
    7. Junguang Gao & Tao Chen & Thomas Schøtt & Fuzhen Gu, 2022. "Entrepreneurs’ Life Satisfaction Built on Satisfaction with Job and Work–Family Balance: Embedded in Society in China, Finland, and Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Robert Cummins, 2003. "Normative Life Satisfaction: Measurement Issues and a Homeostatic Model," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 225-256, November.
    9. John Goyder & Timothy McCutcheon, 1995. "Francophone life satisfaction and civic culture: A meta-analysis of the Canadian case," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 377-394, March.
    10. Clara Viñas-Bardolet & Monica Guillen-Royo & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2018. "Job characteristics and life satisfaction in Europe: A domains-of-life approach," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20180412, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    11. Purushottam Dhakal & Retha Wiesner & Tek Maraseni, 2022. "When Entrepreneurial Leadership Identity and Passion Meet Venture Growth Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Silvia De Simone & Jessica Pileri & Marina Mondo & Max Rapp-Ricciardi & Barbara Barbieri, 2022. "Mea Culpa! The Role of Guilt in the Work-Life Interface and Satisfaction of Women Entrepreneur," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    life satisfaction; work life balance; work centrality; work ethic;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • M0 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rej:journl:v:24:y:2021:i:81:p:50-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Radu Lupu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.