IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rej/journl/v11y2008i27p3-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU and European Models'Competitiveness at Stake

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Bal

    (Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Octavian-Dragomir Jora

    (Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Dana Gârdu

    (Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Vladimir Topan

    (Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

This paper aims to shed light on the following issues: country-specific/country cluster-specific approaches to competitiveness; alternative routes to competitiveness, relying either on national strategies or business endeavour or both; instrument types – institutions and policies – as well as orientation to improve national competitiveness; performance differences among EU country clusters/models. One essential issue is the competitiveness concept and the factors underpinning it in a competitiveness-driven economy, assessing the sustainability of M. Porter’s national competitiveness advantage theory and trying to make sense of the competitive vs. comparative advantage controversy. The debate further leads to national economic models in the EU regarding the degree of state intervention in the economy and the way it impacts upon global competitiveness as defined by the World Economic Forum. Equally valuable is striking a balance between state involvement and aloofness as competitiveness boosters. This also implies revisiting the impact of EU-level regulations upon national competitiveness, ascertaining whether centralization of policies and competencies within the EU can increase competitiveness or inhibit it. Concerning the Lisbon Agenda, it is useful to consider whether to bet on pure knowledge or rather on capital accumulation as a sustainable growth recipe, discriminating between what really spurs competitiveness on and mere fallacies about development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Bal & Octavian-Dragomir Jora & Dana Gârdu & Vladimir Topan, 2008. "The EU and European Models'Competitiveness at Stake," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 11(27), pages 3-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:rej:journl:v:11:y:2008:i:27:p:3-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rejournal.eu/sites/rejournal.versatech.ro/files/articole/2014-04-17/2205/je202720-20bal20at20all.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsoukalis, Loukas, 2003. "What Kind of Europe?," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199266661.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Peterson, 2009. "Leaderless Europe – Edited by Jack Hayward What's Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It – By Simon Hix Europe: The State of the Union – By Anand Menon," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 1129-1133, November.
    2. Antoniades, Andreas, 2009. "Social Europe and/or global Europe? Globalization and flexicurity as debates on the future of Europe," MPRA Paper 28871, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Moosung Lee, 2006. "Bulgaria and EU Membership: A Model or Muddle," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 9(1), pages 111-127, March.
    4. Marjan Senjur, 2012. "A competitive growth of a small midle-income country in the eurozone is far to be assured," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 213-233, September.
    5. Koch, Svea, 2015. "A Typology of Political Conditionality Beyond Aid: Conceptual Horizons Based on Lessons from the European Union," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 97-108.
    6. Octavian-Dragomir Jora, 2007. "Privatizing Pension Systems as the End of a Vicious Taboo of the Almighty State," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 10(25bis), pages 251-268, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    competitiveness; social models; common policies; capital accumulation; knowledge;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H1 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • J0 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rej:journl:v:11:y:2008:i:27:p:3-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Radu Lupu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.