IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v8y2019i6p25-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of infrastructure development in the program of simultaneous movement for village development on economic growth

Author

Listed:
  • Irwan Effendi

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Science College of Agriculture, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia)

  • Leni Sepri Yandi

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Science College of Agriculture, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia)

  • Indah Listiana

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Science College of Agriculture, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia)

Abstract

The Regency of Tulang Bawang develops a program called Simultaneous Movement for Village Development (Gerakan Serentak Membangun Kampung), that is a movement carried out by, from, and for the community of Tulang Bawang to do the right thing together in an effort to accelerate the development of village infrastructure for economic development of village community. Infrastructure limitation leads to the high poverty rate in rural areas. The study of Simultaneous Movement for Village Development Program or Gerakan Serentak Membangun Kampung (GSMK) aims to assess the effect of Direct Cash Transfer for Community (BLM, Dana Bantuan Langsung Masyarakat), and community initiative in GSMK Program on the economic growth of the community in Tulang Bawang Regency. The type of research applied was quantitative research using multiple regression analysis. This study was conducted using secondary data in 2011-2016 sourced from Lampung dalam angka, the result of previous studies, and other supporting data. Moreover, the data required in this study included the total amount of BLM and community initiative in the GSMK Program conducted in Tulang Bawang Regency, and community initiative. The study conducted in Tulang Bawang Regency showed that: (1) There was significant correlation between Direct Cas Transfer for Community and Community Initiative on Economic Growth Rate of Community; (2) Direct Cash Transfer for Community significantly affected the Gross Regional Domestic Product (PDRB)at confidence level of 99%, and(3) Community Initiative did not significantly affect economic growth rate of community since confidence level only reached a value of 11.5%. Key Words:Direct Cash Transfer for Communicy, BLM, Community Initiative, Economic Growth

Suggested Citation

  • Irwan Effendi & Leni Sepri Yandi & Indah Listiana, 2019. "Effect of infrastructure development in the program of simultaneous movement for village development on economic growth," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(6), pages 25-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:8:y:2019:i:6:p:25-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/505/464
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/505/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leo Fatra Nugraha & Lies Sulistyowati & Iwan Setiawan & Trisna Insan Noor, 2022. "Alternative Community-Based Village Development Strategies in Indonesia: Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:8:y:2019:i:6:p:25-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.