Author
Abstract
This study investigated the instructional methods used in the correctional school and during rehabilitation programmes at the Johannesburg Female Correctional Centre in Johannesburg, South Africa. It further explored how those instructional methods influence offenders' learning experiences. Anchored in the positivism paradigm, a quantitative approach was followed, and a cross-sectional survey design was used. The enumeration sampling technique was used due to the small size of the population (n = 571). Data were collected from 402 participants who were sentenced offenders, yielding a response rate of 70.40%. A Kolb Learning Style Inventory was used to collect data. Version 26.0.0 of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to analyze data. Descriptive and inferential statistics were computed as part of data analysis. The results show that during classes and during rehabilitation programmes, classroom discussion was the most common instructional method, and this was found to be appropriate to the participants’ learning experiences. Lecturing was the second most used instructional method for both the Correctional Centre school and the rehabilitation programmes. It was also found to be relevant to the participants’ learning experiences. It is recommended that the Johannesburg Female Correctional Centre formulate and implement a strategy that seeks to deliberately provide variations of instructional methods to accommodate different learning styles if these do not compromise the security within the facility. Teachers/facilitators can use varied techniques to stimulate offenders’ enthusiasm and participation during the sessions. It is further recommended that the Department of Correctional Services should offer professional development opportunities for educators to develop capacity to utilise diverse teaching techniques and create feedback mechanisms to assess instructional effectiveness for offenders. The Department of Correctional Service must further consider developing a framework for monitoring instructional effectiveness or guidelines for integrating new teaching techniques. Key Words:Learning, Instructional methods, Rehabilitation programmes, Correctional centre, Learning experience.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:196-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.