IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v13y2024i6p208-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using self-study approach to critique gender stereotyping and discrimination on family resources for girls and women: educational implications

Author

Listed:
  • Kgomotlokoa Linda

    (Durban University of Technology)

  • Mamothibe Amelia Thamae

    (Durban University of Technology)

Abstract

Girls and women continue to suffer at the hands of patriarchal society that excludes them in family resource allocation. The primary objective of this paper is to examine the challenge that leads to the exclusion of family resource allocation in the form of educational resources for African girls and women. This paper adopts a self-study research approach, which is undergirded by interpretivism philosophical methodology. Intersectional feminism offers a lens for questioning the domination and supremacy of patriarchal society that perpetuates girls’ and women’s vulnerability in the acquisition of family resources in this age. We then discuss how girls and women lead lives marred by hunger, poverty, and inequality. Furthermore, we discuss gender violence and inequality, girl commodification, lessons from matriarchal and patriarchal polities, and gender discrimination at the workplace. We recommend that gender stereotypes and discrimination be eliminated in all social settings; and that at family, society and workplace levels. Finally, that educational institution should reconstruct curricula that should purposively interrogate girls and women's gender stereotyping and discrimination, GBV and other gender issues. Key Words:Family Resources, Gender Discrimination and Stereotyping, Girl Commodification, Interactional Feminism, Self-Study Approach

Suggested Citation

  • Kgomotlokoa Linda & Mamothibe Amelia Thamae, 2024. "Using self-study approach to critique gender stereotyping and discrimination on family resources for girls and women: educational implications," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(6), pages 208-218, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:208-218
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i6.3377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3377/2476
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i6.3377
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i6.3377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:208-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.