IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v12y2023i2p358-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China’s war on poverty: Key lessons for South Africa’s rural developmental stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Olayemi Bakre

    (Researcher, Department of Public Management, Durban University of Technology, 41 ML Sultan Road, Durban, South Africa)

  • Nirmala Dorasamy

    (Professor, Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Management, Durban University of Technology, 41 ML Sultan Road, Durban, South Africa)

Abstract

Prior to China’s reform, the poverty count surpassed that of the whole African continent. However, within five years, the Chinese could reverse this narrative. Between 1980 and 2020, China lifted a staggering 800 million citizens out of poverty. By February 2021, the Chinese declared that the war on ‘absolute poverty’ had been won when measured using the standard equivalence of $2.30 a day per person. In consonance with the Chinese feat on poverty, the study examines the strategy adopted in defeating poverty and highlights fundamental lessons that rural developmental stakeholders in South Africa may embrace in achieving a similar feat. To achieve this aim, the study adopted a literature review alongside a desktop analysis in deducing critical lessons from the Chinese war on poverty that may apply to rural developmental stakeholders in South Africa. Hence, an extensive assemblage of earlier studies on Chinese poverty alleviation strategies was looked into systematically. The study highlights potential challenges the South African rural developmental stakeholders may face in an attempt to replicate the Chinese stratagem. The study thus concludes with practical steps rural developmental stakeholders in South Africa may adopt to create viable rural spaces devoid of egregious forms of poverty. Key Words:China’s poverty, Poverty, Rural development, Rural developmental stakeholders

Suggested Citation

  • Olayemi Bakre & Nirmala Dorasamy, 2023. "China’s war on poverty: Key lessons for South Africa’s rural developmental stakeholders," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(2), pages 358-369, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:358-369
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.2397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/2397/1723
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.2397
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.2397?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:358-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.