IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v11y2022i10p410-415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critiquing scientific writing for knowledge development in South African public administration scholarship: Selected reviews in South African articles and books

Author

Listed:
  • Mokoko Piet Sebola

    (Professor, Department of Development Studies, University of South Africa, Preller Street, Muckleneuk Ridge, City of Tshwane, South Africa)

Abstract

As qualitative research, this article aims to critically engage on the level of scholarship by modern scholars for pursuing knowledge development in South African public administration. The article also concludes that the purpose of peer review is to evaluate and improve the text and that if scholars perceive their purpose in review as to criticise and not to critique the scientific work for areas of improvement, they expose their weaknesses and biases, which does not contribute to knowledge development and improvement in the scholarship debates. Key Words:Public Administration Scholarship, Peer review, Scientific, qualitative approach

Suggested Citation

  • Mokoko Piet Sebola, 2022. "Critiquing scientific writing for knowledge development in South African public administration scholarship: Selected reviews in South African articles and books," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 410-415, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:410-415
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.2181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/2181/1633
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.2181
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.2181?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:410-415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.