Author
Listed:
- Iconaru Claudia
(The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)
- Perju Alexandra
(The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)
- Macovei Octav Ionut
(The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)
Abstract
When buying online consumers fear for the security of their financial data and the privacy of their personal information. These two fears summed up gives researchers the perceived risk of an online transaction. The influence of perceived risk on consumers’ intention to buy online has been studied in various models, ranging from having an insignificant influence to having a strong and direct influence. Faced with these confusing results from previous empirical researches, we wonder why there are such differences among reported results. Is perceived risk a strong predictable of the consumers’ intention to buy online? Should it be considered a significant impact variable when modelling online consumer behaviour? We answer these research questions by conducting a meta-analysis on previous empirical findings. We first conduct a search for academic articles that have included perceived risk in their explanatory and predictive models of online consumer behaviour. The search was carried out using ScienceDirect international database and Google search engine. The selection of articles to be included in the study was based on some defined inclusion criteria. All included models had to be based on an empirical research and had to report the correlation coefficient between perceived risk and intention to buy online. We selected 11independent studies for inclusion in our meta-analysis. We report the findings from the mean effect sizes using a comparison between three methods: simple mean method, sample size-adjusted mean and Fisher r to Z transformation. Both limitations of this analysis and managerial implications are discussed.
Suggested Citation
Iconaru Claudia & Perju Alexandra & Macovei Octav Ionut, 2012.
"The Influence Of Perceived Risk On Conumers’ Intention To Buy Online: A Meta-Analysis Of Empirical Results,"
Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 6(1), pages 162-174, May.
Handle:
RePEc:rau:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:162-174
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:162-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/firauro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.