IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v6y2011i3p127-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Some Economic Aspects Of The European Competition Policy Rhetoric

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Stamate

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

Economic aspects are things to look for in any competition policy. The present paper focuses on the European competition policy and its two important general frameworks: Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty for Establishing the European Community. The two articles prohibit various entrepreneurial actions on a market which can affect the consumer welfare and also, the competition between entrepreneurs. The paper attempts to find economic justifications of the European Commission’s interventions on the market, which is the authority responsible for enforcing the two articles, and also to deliver an alternative theory of the market in the tradition of the Austrian school of economics. The reason for this purpose is that the economic justifications would be the only to legitimate the competition laws.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Stamate, 2011. "On Some Economic Aspects Of The European Competition Policy Rhetoric," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 6(3), pages 127-137, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:3:p:127-137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/journl/FA11/REBE-FA11-A9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cosmin Ivascu, 2021. "The Role of European Funds in the Economic Development," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 24(79), pages 75-89, March.
    2. Cristian PAUN, 2015. "The Role of European Union Funds in Economic Development," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 3(3), pages 463-481, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:3:p:127-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.